We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: No more prostitution

Details

Submitted by^[?]: soccer_trekkie Party

Status^[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2073

Description^[?]:

Prostitution should be illegal. The sex trade serves only to increase the rate ot STI's (Sexually transmittend infections) It is harmful to people's physical and mental states, it breaks up families, and nobody really wants their kids to see a prostitute on the street in front of their house, or let their kids play outside when there is a prostitute there.

Proposals

Article 1

Proposal^[?] to change The right for a person to prostitute himself or herself.

Old value:: Prostitution is legal and a recognized profession.

Current: Prostitution is legal and a recognized profession.

Proposed: Prostitution is illegal.

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date	06:37:33, June 26, 2005 CET
From	National Libertarian Party
To	Debating the No more prostitution
Message	sry, bud, but no. People have the right to sell there bodies, no matter the price. It should not be the problem of the government if they are willing to harm there own bodies. Also Illegalizing it would bring it underground.

Date	09:02:24, June 26, 2005 CET
From	Democratic Centre Party of Gaduridos
To	Debating the No more prostitution
Message	Prostitution will exist whether we want it to or not. The best way to deal with the problems you brought up is through regulation - if regulated, prostitutes can be screened for diseases and given free condoms, combatting the spread of STIs and STDs. Also, if the trade is regulated we can ensure all prostitution happens in one district, so there is no conflict with residential streets.

Date	10:32:13, June 26, 2005 CET
From	National Democratic Party
To	Debating the No more prostitution
Message	Have you read the laws on prostituion? I made sure that they were extremely tough! So STIs and what not have reduced since the laws were put into effect.

Date	16:46:27, June 26, 2005 CET
From	Social Democrat Party
To	Debating the No more prostitution
Message	no

Date	18:40:29, June 26, 2005 CET
From	soccer_trekkie Party
To	Debating the No more prostitution
Message	I understand that the laws right now are strict, but by having it legal you are telling hte people that it is okay. Yes it is their choice, but it should not be considered a good thing. Even if it is illegal STI testing, condoms and so forth can still be provided as I have seen happen in other countries. I do not think it is good that teens who are having trouble look at prostitution as a viable option. I think making it illegal will reduce that.

Date	20:04:56, June 26, 2005 CET
From	National Democratic Party
To	Debating the No more prostitution
Message	its illegal for anyone under 21 anyway.

Date	03:00:14, June 27, 2005 CET
From	National Libertarian Party
To	Debating the No more prostitution
Message	It is still not the governments problem and who says prostitution is bad?

Date	07:49:07, June 27, 2005 CET
From	soccer_trekkie Party
To	Debating the No more prostitution
Message	It may be illegal under 21, but that does not stop people under 21 from looking at that as a possible option fot their future. If you family is really poor, and you see a prostitute that makes more money in a few hours than your parents do in a day, that could look very appealing. Would you want your kids to see that?

Date	12:04:51, June 27, 2005 CET
From	Social Democrat Party
To	Debating the No more prostitution
Message	I think that people aged 21 are sufficiently mature to make their own decision when it comes to prostitution.

Date	16:41:47, June 27, 2005 CET
From	National Libertarian Party
To	Debating the No more prostitution
Message	What is wrong with prostitution? You talk as if it is a desease!

Date	17:14:33, June 27, 2005 CET
From	National Libertarian Party
To	Debating the No more prostitution
Message	disease*

Date	18:08:59, June 27, 2005 CET
From	soccer_trekkie Party
To	Debating the No more prostitution
Message	I do not think it is a disease, but there are amny well documented medical, psychological, and social problems with it.

Date	01:40:50, June 28, 2005 CET
From	People's Progressive Party
To	Debating the No more prostitution
Message	We will stick with the status quo for now, it doesn't seem to be a major issue in our opinion. More education will make prostitution a less than desireable career choice.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote

Seats

yes

soccer_trekkie Party (32)
Conservative Republic Independent Party (20)

Total Seats: 52

People's Progressive Party (66)
Social Democrat Party (59)
Democratic Centre Party of Gaduridos (56)
National Democratic Party (48)
National Libertarian Party (32)
Technophilic Progressive Party (19)

Total Seats: 280

abstain

Bolsjevik Party (0)
ghoullio Party (0)

Total Seats: 0

Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed).

Random quote: "And what is Aleppo?" - Gary Johnson

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 79