Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5476
Next month in: 00:15:36
Server time: 19:44:23, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): hexaus18 | TaMan443 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Nuclear Safety Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Kirlawa Green Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2074

Description[?]:

"Should we, at any time, become the last nation armed with nuclear weapons we will immediately and unanimously destroy them.

Should all other nations in the world pass this same law as is being proposed here, we will also disarm in that circumstance."

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:32:26, June 27, 2005 CET
From Theofascist Party
ToDebating the Nuclear Safety Act
MessageAh, but who's to say that after the global disarmament, no nation will ever produce nukes again? And who guarantees that we would indeed be the last nuclear power?

I foresee many difficulties in this treaty.

Date17:36:09, June 27, 2005 CET
FromKirlawa Green Party
ToDebating the Nuclear Safety Act
Messagebottem line is : we need to ban nuclear weapons... And even if some terrorist groups still have nuclear weapons: whether we have any or not will not stop them from using them. Many are prepared to die for their cause...

Date17:40:44, June 27, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Nuclear Safety Act
MessageNO! We should always reserve the right to devlop Nuclear Weapons, after all they'll give you the damm "infuflence" ((CIS)) in the world that you want.

Date06:29:25, June 28, 2005 CET
FromFree Liberal Party of Kirlawa
ToDebating the Nuclear Safety Act
MessageWe like the idea, but:

A. How would we be *sure* that we were the last such nation?

B. How would we be sure that that situation continued? Do you have a plan for the unlearning of science? Short of bombing (with conventional bombs, I'd imagine) the physics department of every university in the world, I can't forsee that happening.

Date13:05:29, June 28, 2005 CET
From Theofascist Party
ToDebating the Nuclear Safety Act
MessageExactly what I said, Mr. President. :)

Date14:39:21, June 28, 2005 CET
FromKirlawa Green Party
ToDebating the Nuclear Safety Act
MessageDo you have a plan for the unlearning of science? Short of bombing (with conventional bombs, I'd imagine) the physics department of every university in the world, I can't forsee that happening.


We don't want ot ban nuclear power with this treaty, only nuclear weapons... research is allowed (such as nuclear fusion,...)

Date23:34:56, June 28, 2005 CET
From Theofascist Party
ToDebating the Nuclear Safety Act
MessageI have a feeling that neither of the two options in the bill will ever happen. The bill's intention is good, but I have no faith in its effectiveness. I shall therefore be voting against.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 107

no
     

Total Seats: 174

abstain
 

Total Seats: 19


Random fact: All role-play must respect the established cultural background in Culturally Protected nations.

Random quote: "We pursue no other aim than freedom from oppression, liberty from lies, salvation from irrationality!" - Julius Callus, former Davostani politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 58