We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Etichette alimentari, 2281
Details
Submitted by[?]: Partito Social-Liberista Istaliano
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2281
Description[?]:
| Manteniamo solo le informazioni utili: se lo Stato prevede l'uso di agenti chimici nell'agricoltura, non serve ribadirlo. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Listing of controversial ingredients, such as genetically modified (GM) ingredients (if food labelling is applied).
Old value:: Any chemicals used in agrigulture or processing, and any GM ingredients must be listed.
Current: Any chemicals used in agrigulture or processing, and any GM ingredients must be listed.
Proposed: Any GM ingredients must be listed. There is no requirement to disclose chemicals used in agrigulture or processing.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change
Scope of food ingredient labeling (if present).
Old value:: All ingredients and corresponding nutritional information must be listed.
Current: All ingredients and corresponding nutritional information must be listed.
Proposed: Only the major ingredients and those with specific labelling requirements must be listed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 12:07:44, September 08, 2006 CET | From | Forza Manager4Life | To | Debating the Etichette alimentari, 2281 |
| Message | D'accordo con il primo articolo, per il secondo va bene l'impostazione attuale |
| Date | 12:12:05, September 08, 2006 CET | From |  Partito Social-Liberista Istaliano | To | Debating the Etichette alimentari, 2281 |
| Message | Terremo conto, se non passerà. |
| Date | 13:34:41, September 08, 2006 CET | From | Partito Borisista Istaliano - S.I. | To | Debating the Etichette alimentari, 2281 |
| Message | Siamo contrari, lo stato è giusto che permetta l'utilizzo di prodotti chimici ma il consumatore dev'essere messo nella condizione di sapere cosa mangia e di poter scegliere liberamente, siamo dunque contrari a questa proposta. |
| Date | 14:34:29, September 08, 2006 CET | From | Partito Social-Liberista Istaliano | To | Debating the Etichette alimentari, 2281 |
| Message | Beh, mettere un'etichetta che afferma come il prodotto contenga "glutammato di sodio monodoico" ed altre definizioni comprensibili solo ai chimici non aumenta la sicurezza dei consumatori, anzi. Se invece le etichette contengono solo le cose essenziali, rendono più semplice la scelta. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 87 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 483 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 29 |
| Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
| Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |