We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Old scool marriage Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Republican Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2074
Description[?]:
| We people of the United Tribes of Tukarali belive in marriage between a man and a woman only. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy toward marriage.
Old value:: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Current: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Proposed: The government only recognises civil marriages between a man and a woman.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:12:16, June 28, 2005 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Old scool marriage Act |
| Message | Oppose. I proposed the current law. |
| Date | 21:19:52, June 28, 2005 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the Old scool marriage Act |
| Message | The homo-marriages shouldn't have same right as normal marraiges for example in kids adoption . |
| Date | 21:48:53, June 28, 2005 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Old scool marriage Act |
| Message | I disagree: there is no reason why homosexual couples should not be able to adopt. And "homo" is an offensive term. |
| Date | 22:12:36, June 28, 2005 CET | From | Nationalist Free-Market Republican Party | To | Debating the Old scool marriage Act |
| Message | DSP, if someone is offended by the word "homo," they need to toughen up. There is nothing in the constitution or the ten commandments that say "thou shalt not be offended" |
| Date | 08:19:23, June 29, 2005 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the Old scool marriage Act |
| Message | The reason why homosexual couples shoulddn't be able to adopt is simple. This is unnatural couples. They don't provide basic knowledge and difference for adoptet child. Difference between man and woman. |
| Date | 17:30:43, June 29, 2005 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Old scool marriage Act |
| Message | We'll support this proposal |
| Date | 19:34:40, June 29, 2005 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Old scool marriage Act |
| Message | Homosexuality is perfectly natural: it is present constantly in nature. I don't quite understand what your second sentence means. |
| Date | 21:07:13, June 29, 2005 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the Old scool marriage Act |
| Message | God made Adam and Eve. There is nothing about homosexuals in Bible. |
| Date | 21:12:02, June 29, 2005 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Old scool marriage Act |
| Message | Sodom and Gamorrah! It was called sodomy in the bible actually. |
| Date | 10:43:21, June 30, 2005 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the Old scool marriage Act |
| Message | Look what God make with them. We don't want the same. |
| Date | 19:17:30, July 12, 2005 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Old scool marriage Act |
| Message | God didn't mention toothbrushes either. They exist. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 113 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 82 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 104 |
| Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map. |
| Random quote: "The European Union and environmental advocacy groups use global warming hysteria to advance their own special agendas. The European Union recognizes any significant reduction in CO2 emissions by the United States will significantly reduce its economic output, thereby bringing it closer to the inferior output of European nations. Environmental advocacy groups work to stifle economic and industrial progress wherever they find it to inhibit the successful advancement of peoples in developing nations, inevitably making mankind a second class citizen of planet Earth." - Dr. Jay Lehr |