We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Withdrawal from the Unified Iron Curtain Treaty
Details
Submitted by[?]: Spiritualists' National Union
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2285
Description[?]:
| To become a successful and influential country in the world, Luthori needs to shed herself of this cumbersome and backward-looking Treaty. |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the Unified Iron Curtain.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:46:02, September 15, 2006 CET | From | Redneck Party | To | Debating the Withdrawal from the Unified Iron Curtain Treaty |
| Message | No |
| Date | 23:08:42, September 15, 2006 CET | From | Imperial Party | To | Debating the Withdrawal from the Unified Iron Curtain Treaty |
| Message | agrees with redneck party |
| Date | 03:19:18, September 16, 2006 CET | From | Cannon Party | To | Debating the Withdrawal from the Unified Iron Curtain Treaty |
| Message | The Cannons are disinclined to support this withdrawal at this time. |
| Date | 10:46:04, September 16, 2006 CET | From | Spiritualists' National Union | To | Debating the Withdrawal from the Unified Iron Curtain Treaty |
| Message | <shudders at the fault of remaining trapped in Luthori behind an Iron Curtain with Rednecks, Imperialists etc...> :-) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 30 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 50 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 20 |
| Random fact: For more information on Particracy's former colonial nations, check out http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6640 |
| Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |