Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5461
Next month in: 02:43:22
Server time: 21:16:37, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): Arusu-Weareback | Autokrator30 | hexaus18 | Sevenberry | wstodden2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Secondary Strike Ban

Details

Submitted by[?]: Democratic Party of Rildanor

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2288

Description[?]:

pretty to the point

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:04:31, September 24, 2006 CET
FromDemocratic Party of Rildanor
ToDebating the Secondary Strike Ban
Messagewe have to remove that treaty

Date00:19:38, September 24, 2006 CET
From Mouvement des Conservateurs
ToDebating the Secondary Strike Ban
MessageIF the Peace Treaty is withdrawn before the year 2300. The MAREM will restart its revolution. BE FOREWARNED!

Date00:25:31, September 24, 2006 CET
FromDemocratic Party of Rildanor
ToDebating the Secondary Strike Ban
MessageI rather have a revolution over some restrictive treaty that prohibits us from doing what is right

Date00:30:47, September 24, 2006 CET
From Mouvement des Conservateurs
ToDebating the Secondary Strike Ban
MessageMay I remind you that that revolution started a world war between communists and capitalists.

Date00:55:36, September 24, 2006 CET
FromDemocratic Party of Rildanor
ToDebating the Secondary Strike Ban
Messagefine as a capitalist (no disrespect my communist friend ) I think we should fight communism and all forms of socialism once and for all

I encourage a world war if it means the end of all oppresive socialist governments

Date01:02:58, September 24, 2006 CET
From Mouvement des Conservateurs
ToDebating the Secondary Strike Ban
MessageOOC: I love to have competition :-)

IC: Then we have a problem!

Date02:00:19, September 24, 2006 CET
From Front Canrillaise
ToDebating the Secondary Strike Ban
MessageRest assured, the MC will not touch the peace treaty until the specified date. We want to preserve this peace in Rildanor in order to recover from the devastating conflict.

Date19:56:14, September 24, 2006 CET
FromDemocratic Party of Rildanor
ToDebating the Secondary Strike Ban
Messagewell I promise I shall propose a withdrawal from that treaty after every election as I said it is way too restrictive

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 124

no
 

Total Seats: 167

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: It is possible for a player to transfer ownership of a character or a royal house to another player. This should be done in a public way, such as on the Character Transfers thread, so that if a dispute arises in the future, Moderation can be pointed towards evidence of the transfer.

    Random quote: "The evil of the world is made possible by nothing but the sanction you give it." - Ayn Rand

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 59