Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5478
Next month in: 02:04:15
Server time: 21:55:44, May 02, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Mbites2 | MbitesCildania | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Electoral reform of 2289

Details

Submitted by[?]: One Nation Socialist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2293

Description[?]:

reforming local and naional electoral systems to the more traditional policy.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:24:05, September 26, 2006 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the Electoral reform of 2289
MessageWhy?

Date17:32:09, September 26, 2006 CET
FromOne Nation Socialist Party
ToDebating the Electoral reform of 2289
Messagearticle 1 is more democratic and provides effective scrutiny.
Article 2 because it gives recognition to our countries history, that we were once divided tribes and so the different values of the different tribes will be represented.

Date18:07:30, September 26, 2006 CET
FromTuánjiédǎng (团结党)
ToDebating the Electoral reform of 2289
MessageOppose, your making this country un democratic.

Date20:58:04, September 26, 2006 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the Electoral reform of 2289
MessageArticle 1 we understand, article 2 we like it the way it is..

Date10:59:32, September 30, 2006 CET
FromOne Nation Socialist Party
ToDebating the Electoral reform of 2289
MessageI must say its strange to have a fascist call me undemocratic.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 285

no
 

Total Seats: 210

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining.

Random quote: "This administration is not sympathetic to corporations; it is indentured to corporations." - Ralph Nader

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 56