We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Romano Enterprise International Acknowledgement
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Centrist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2074
Description[?]:
| The Malivian business Romano Enterprises is seeking to leave the country through a declaration of themselves as an official international organization. They cannot leave through normal methods; Malivian laws will not allow this. If they cannot get international support on this, the Government of Malivia will forcefully reposses everything owned by the company. This could lead to civil war, as Mr. Romano (the founder of Romano Enterprises) is head of a coalition of parties within Malivia. That coalition makes up 48% of Malivia's Legislature. If even a small portion of the people they represent resist this action, the consequences would be grim. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:09:45, June 29, 2005 CET | From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Romano Enterprise International Acknowledgement |
| Message | There are so many levels on which this should be supported, but the one that means it needs to go straight to vote is the fact of potential bloodshed. |
| Date | 23:14:02, June 29, 2005 CET | From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Romano Enterprise International Acknowledgement |
| Message | However, I will list a few other reasons, as well, for anyone who is not moved by the "preventing human suffering" ideal. For instance, there is the entirely personal part about my hopes to arrange technological trades between the LFP and the Malivian Free Reform Coalition. I will honestly admit to this being a motivation to me pressing this. It is not the most respectable motivation, but I won't hide it dishonestly. There are, however, many other concerns that are more reasonable. For instance, the problem of how wars destroy infrastructure in the affected country, thus devastating a potential market (Malivia). They also tend to overspill their borders. Furthermore, nations damaged by war are very unstable. |
| Date | 23:42:09, June 29, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Party for Equality | To | Debating the Romano Enterprise International Acknowledgement |
| Message | I was there with the suffering. We support, as long our inspection of this organisation doesnt suggest that it is wholly to blame... yes, the situation seems to be as you have described. |
| Date | 00:16:05, June 30, 2005 CET | From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Romano Enterprise International Acknowledgement |
| Message | Wait, LPE, are you saying to side with the Malivian government, or the Romano Enterprises? I'm supporting Mr. Romano and the FRC. It's acceptable to oppose on that ground. I'd rather have you opposing honestly than supporting because of a misconception. |
| Date | 10:27:32, June 30, 2005 CET | From | Right Wing Liberals Party | To | Debating the Romano Enterprise International Acknowledgement |
| Message | I say we do not suport a strong Malivia and when they rebel we annex them. i dont know what to vote for as it dont think its clear. Romano Enterprises should not be a seperate entity to the Government. If the Malivian Government wants International support and does not get it then thats an indication that the world supports the Seperatist movement of Mr Romano. Meaning The Malivian Government is in the wrong if we support Malivia then we could be supporting tyrants but if we support Romano we could be supporting Terrorists. It cannot affect us if we dont have deals with these people already.There downfall will not affect us currently yet if we go through with a trade deal future problems will certainly affect us. Just some views of this from both sides. But seriously who are we intended to support through this bill? Romano or The Govt? |
| Date | 16:30:13, June 30, 2005 CET | From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Romano Enterprise International Acknowledgement |
| Message | Like I said before, I'm supporting Romano. |
| Date | 14:32:53, July 01, 2005 CET | From | Right Wing Liberals Party | To | Debating the Romano Enterprise International Acknowledgement |
| Message | But who else is do they know who they are supporting?? |
| Date | 15:56:23, July 01, 2005 CET | From | Edelweiss Party | To | Debating the Romano Enterprise International Acknowledgement |
| Message | That a million dollar capitalist company is not supported by a communist government is somewhat the most common thing in the world. Now they're playing their victim-role very well and hoping to establish international wealth and fame? No, we don't support this, many governments will fall for the sad story and the millions of money behind it. At the end Romano Enterprises will end up meddling in national governments, putting pressure on them in their own advantage. We, SocialGreens does not want to support a company that says tomorrow how we have to govern our nation! |
| Date | 14:25:12, July 02, 2005 CET | From | Right Wing Liberals Party | To | Debating the Romano Enterprise International Acknowledgement |
| Message | Your greed will be our downfall. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 169 | ||||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 31 | ||||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In order for a Cabinet bill to pass, more than half of the legislature must vote for it and all of the parties included in the proposed Cabinet must support it. If your nation has a Head of State who is also the Head of Government, then the party controlling this character must also vote for the bill, since the Head of Government is also a member of the Cabinet. If any of these requirements are not met, the bill will not pass. |
| Random quote: "What is conservatism? Is it not the adherence to the old and tried against the new and untried?" - Abraham Lincoln |