We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Auto Regulation Initiative 2074
Details
Submitted by[?]: Federalist Labour Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2075
Description[?]:
| For the people. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning private cars.
Old value:: There are no regulations on the ownership of private cars.
Current: Private cars are allowed, but people are encouraged to travel collective and tax incentives are provided for cars using environmentally friendly fuels.
Proposed: Only cars using environmentally friendly fuels are allowed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:37:55, June 30, 2005 CET | From | Federalist Labour Party | To | Debating the Auto Regulation Initiative 2074 |
| Message | We prefer 'Private cars are not allowed'. As we believe the state should have exclusive control over all modern necessities including transportation, so that prices are kept low, efficiency and quality are prioritized and personal income taxation and worker exploitation can be completely eliminated. |
| Date | 03:00:54, June 30, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Auto Regulation Initiative 2074 |
| Message | Do we have enviromentally friendly cars that are cheap to run? |
| Date | 04:19:14, June 30, 2005 CET | From | Federalist Labour Party | To | Debating the Auto Regulation Initiative 2074 |
| Message | Yes. There have been countless technological innovations over the past century (real world), which have been suppressed by both private citizens as well as governments. |
| Date | 06:25:28, June 30, 2005 CET | From |  Theofascist Party | To | Debating the Auto Regulation Initiative 2074 |
| Message | I'll vote for if the proposal's changed to "Private cars are allowed, but people are encouraged to travel collective and tax incentives are provided for cars using environmentally friendly fuels." |
| Date | 07:33:32, June 30, 2005 CET | From | Federalist Labour Party | To | Debating the Auto Regulation Initiative 2074 |
| Message | Yea, but that proposal would instate 'corporate welfare'. |
| Date | 08:03:02, June 30, 2005 CET | From | Kirlawa Green Party | To | Debating the Auto Regulation Initiative 2074 |
| Message | we will support this act |
| Date | 09:19:21, June 30, 2005 CET | From | New Libertarian Leftist Alliance | To | Debating the Auto Regulation Initiative 2074 |
| Message | yeah |
| Date | 22:17:05, July 02, 2005 CET | From | Free Liberal Party of Kirlawa | To | Debating the Auto Regulation Initiative 2074 |
| Message | Next thing you know, gasoline/petrol is no longer "environmentally friendly". |
| Date | 16:16:32, July 03, 2005 CET | From | Kirlawa Green Party | To | Debating the Auto Regulation Initiative 2074 |
| Message | well it isn't |
| Date | 07:55:15, July 04, 2005 CET | From | Free Liberal Party of Kirlawa | To | Debating the Auto Regulation Initiative 2074 |
| Message | So, what? Is it back to rickshaws for Kirlawa? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 189 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 92 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 19 |
| Random fact: Jelbic = "Group of cultures with an overall Central Asian/Eurasian steppe theme, using a fictional language developed specifically for Particracy". |
| Random quote: "Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." - John Dalberg-Acton |