We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Breed, Woman! (ii) Act of 2294
Details
Submitted by[?]: Nuncirist Party of Telamon
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2296
Description[?]:
| Having children should be a financial advantage, not a burden. We must encourage large families at all time, thats why we propose to provide children's benefit for all families. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding child benefit.
Old value:: The state guarantees child benefit to both low-income families and large families.
Current: The state guarantees child benefit to all families.
Proposed: The state guarantees child benefit to all families.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:57:13, October 05, 2006 CET | From | Catholic Workers Union | To | Debating the Breed, Woman! (ii) Act of 2294 |
| Message | We'd like to support a larger welfare state, but we can't afford giving benefits to all families at this time. |
| Date | 00:01:06, October 06, 2006 CET | From | Nuncirist Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Breed, Woman! (ii) Act of 2294 |
| Message | May we ask in which sector of our social system the state's welfare budget has priority, other then child benefit. |
| Date | 02:42:42, October 06, 2006 CET | From | Telamon Royalist Party | To | Debating the Breed, Woman! (ii) Act of 2294 |
| Message | We'll probably abstain from this, actually. We don't really have an opinion on this. |
| Date | 03:03:09, October 06, 2006 CET | From | Catholic Workers Union | To | Debating the Breed, Woman! (ii) Act of 2294 |
| Message | Don't understand your question. |
| Date | 18:18:07, October 06, 2006 CET | From | Páirtí Sóisialach | To | Debating the Breed, Woman! (ii) Act of 2294 |
| Message | Be realistic: do you want to pay 99 per cent income tax? 73 per cent GST? 250 per cent luxury goods tax? If not, vote against this. Again, the Centre party would like to object to the title of this bill as chauvanistic and sexist. If the ITP wishes to put its bigotry on display, we humbly request that it not affect us or any other citizen of the noble Telamon Commonwealth. |
| Date | 22:09:19, October 08, 2006 CET | From | Nuncirist Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Breed, Woman! (ii) Act of 2294 |
| Message | We agree with the Centre Party to vote against this bill, unanimously. It will prove and show to the citizens of Telamon that the traditional democratic parties select their target groups, THE parties who only want to provide certain groups of citizens with welfare and NOT every citizen, like our party proposes. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 23 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 215 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 57 |
| Random fact: In cases where players have failed to clearly and accurately reference their nation's RP laws in the "Bills under debate" section, Moderation will rule them invalid if a challenge is made to their validity. |
| Random quote: "If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual [gay] sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything!" - Rick Santorum |