Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 01:39:51
Server time: 18:20:08, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Act of 2006

Details

Submitted by[?]: Unified Society Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2297

Description[?]:

This bill demands you to take care of your property constantly.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:46:35, October 11, 2006 CET
FromConservative-Libertarian Party (UM)
ToDebating the Act of 2006
MessageJust a tip, without any proposals in here, this bill does not make any difference whatsoever. Also, it's a rather silly proposal if I may say so...a bit vague.

Date10:50:25, October 11, 2006 CET
FromConservative-Libertarian Party (UM)
ToDebating the Act of 2006
MessageJust a tip, without any proposals in here, this bill does not make any difference whatsoever. Also, it's a rather silly proposal if I may say so...a bit vague.

Date10:50:44, October 11, 2006 CET
FromConservative-Libertarian Party (UM)
ToDebating the Act of 2006
MessageJust a tip, without any proposals in here, this bill does not make any difference whatsoever. Also, it's a rather silly proposal if I may say so...a bit vague.

Date10:50:47, October 11, 2006 CET
FromConservative-Libertarian Party (UM)
ToDebating the Act of 2006
MessageJust a tip, without any proposals in here, this bill does not make any difference whatsoever. Also, it's a rather silly proposal if I may say so...a bit vague.

Date10:51:36, October 11, 2006 CET
FromConservative-Libertarian Party (UM)
ToDebating the Act of 2006
MessageJust a tip, without any proposals in here, this bill does not make any difference whatsoever. Also, it's a rather silly proposal if I may say so...a bit vague.

Date13:58:58, October 11, 2006 CET
FromConservative-Libertarian Party (UM)
ToDebating the Act of 2006
MessageApologies for that....I have no idea why it posted so many times!!!!!

Date18:05:01, October 11, 2006 CET
FromNational Party of Vensism
ToDebating the Act of 2006
Messagehehe.. looks funny though ;)
But i do not really understand the bill. And indeed try to add a proposal.
But.. why are you disagreeing with your own bill?
I will abstain untill i understand this bill.

Date21:12:09, October 11, 2006 CET
FromUnified Society Party
ToDebating the Act of 2006
Messagesorry didnt mean to submit this for voting

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
    

Total Seats: 22

abstain
  

Total Seats: 53


Random fact: It is the collective responsibility of the players in a nation to ensure all currently binding RP laws are clearly outlined in an OOC reference bill in the "Bills under debate" section of the nation page. Confusion should not be created by displaying only some of the current RP laws or displaying RP laws which are no longer current.

Random quote: "Taxes, after all, are dues that we pay for the privileges of membership in an organized society." - Franklin D. Roosevelt

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 54