We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Malpractice Standardisation Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Liberal Alliance
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2300
Description[?]:
| This bill would standardise malpractice regulations across the Commonwealth and allow malpractice suits to be brought against doctors |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Malpractice suits.
Old value:: Malpractice regulations are left to the locality of the practicing doctor.
Current: Malpractice suits may be brought against doctors.
Proposed: Malpractice suits may be brought against doctors.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:57:29, October 15, 2006 CET | From | Catholic Workers Union | To | Debating the Malpractice Standardisation Bill |
| Message | "We respectively oppose. This is really a matter of local policy. We support a localized national health service, and this is part of allowing Cantons to determine local policy." -Elizabeth Carmichael IADP MP |
| Date | 07:20:32, October 15, 2006 CET | From | Telamon Royalist Party | To | Debating the Malpractice Standardisation Bill |
| Message | We're going to have to stand with the UCA on this. No Canton, no city, and not even the Commonwealth should have the legal right to prevent malpractice suits from being brought against neglegent, or worse, willfully corrupt, doctors. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 223 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 78 |
| Random fact: All role-play must respect the established cultural background in Culturally Protected nations. |
| Random quote: "A prince never lacks legitimate reasons to break his promise." - Niccolo Machiavelli |