We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: SLP - Constitutional Amendment.
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Liberal Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2300
Description[?]:
| Before we go to elections. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The number of proposals a party can introduce per year (will be handed out as a monthly quota).
Old value:: 15
Current: 20
Proposed: 12
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The title of the head of government, who chairs the cabinet.
Old value:: Primeiro-Ministro
Current: Staatskanzler/Staatskanselier (State Chancellor)
Proposed: Primeiro Ministro
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government-issued identity card policy.
Old value:: All citizens are issued with identity cards and are required to carry them at all times.
Current: All citizens are issued with identity cards and are required to carry them at all times.
Proposed: Citizens are not issued with identity cards.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:37:53, October 15, 2006 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the SLP - Constitutional Amendment. |
| Message | Why the reduction from 15 to 12? Ah! The SLP knows that the Conservative Party will win these elections and is afraid, right? We are totally against this restrictive ammendment to the constitution: clearly an attempt of the SLP to secure its ifluence over legislative power. NO WAY! |
| Date | 19:46:22, October 15, 2006 CET | From | Social Liberal Party | To | Debating the SLP - Constitutional Amendment. |
| Message | The reduction of 15 to twelve is merely to give an equal opportunity for parties that are less active. The SLP has governed these past 4 years with a relatively unchecked majority and we have gained a fair understanding on the legislative process. Slightly adjusting the number of proposals to 12, or in other words, one per month, would make the lawmaking process much easier. We are also confident that we will retain the confidence of Lusitanians. |
| Date | 19:48:48, October 15, 2006 CET | From | Social Liberal Party | To | Debating the SLP - Constitutional Amendment. |
| Message | In any even, this proposed amendment will be reset automatically to debate status before the voting session comes to a close. The CP's accusations are baseless. |
| Date | 19:55:49, October 16, 2006 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the SLP - Constitutional Amendment. |
| Message | We would vote yes if article 1 was deleted. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |
| yes |
Total Seats: 64 | |
| no |
Total Seats: 179 | |
| abstain |
Total Seats: 57 |
| Random fact: The use of proxy servers makes it impossible to detect multiing and is therefore forbidden. Players who access Particracy through a proxy will have their accounts inactivated. |
| Random quote: "When there's a single thief, it's robbery. When there are a thousand thieves, it's taxation. " -Vanya Cohen |