Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5480
Next month in: 02:27:27
Server time: 09:32:32, May 09, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Pensions

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Forwardist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2076

Description[?]:

The great majority of people who retire need some form of finincial aid, and it is the duty of the more fortunate to care for the worse off.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date07:43:46, July 02, 2005 CET
FromOpinion Poll Vultures
ToDebating the Pensions
MessageWhat happened to people making choices for themselves? Why would anyone bother to save money if they know the government will save them in the long run?

Date08:05:24, July 02, 2005 CET
FromNational Forwardist Party
ToDebating the Pensions
MessageI will not sit back and watch as 80-90 year olds keep their minimum wage jobs well past retirement because they never made enough to save for themselves.

It is our duty to help these people.

making decisions for yourself has nothing to do with this.

Date11:12:17, July 02, 2005 CET
FromOpinion Poll Vultures
ToDebating the Pensions
MessageLOL

Yay! We can all ignore responsibility and not work for a living, the government will bail us out no matter how much we fail to take responsibility for!

Date16:14:16, July 02, 2005 CET
FromDemocratic Socialists of Luthori
ToDebating the Pensions
MessageWe will support this, of course.

Date19:50:55, July 02, 2005 CET
FromSocial Calvinist Unionist Party
ToDebating the Pensions
MessageOk then.

However, is this like a normal pension system(where you get money depending on what you worked, how much, how long, etc), or are you just going to go, "Here, have some money!" We only support giving money to the EXTREMLY poor(as in they can't feed themselves), but everyone else should get paid depending on how much they worked.

Date16:23:13, July 03, 2005 CET
FromOpinion Poll Vultures
ToDebating the Pensions
Messageits compulsory, that means they'll go "Here, have some money!"

Date23:04:58, July 03, 2005 CET
FromNational Forwardist Party
ToDebating the Pensions
Message'compusory' means that people like you don't have the option of letting these people starve to death because they never made enough to live off of when they were working age.

Date15:00:52, July 04, 2005 CET
FromCatholic Peoples Party
ToDebating the Pensions
MessageI'm fine with it, people can always get suplemental pensions from private companies...

Date02:15:27, July 05, 2005 CET
FromNational Forwardist Party
ToDebating the Pensions
Messageactually, private pensions in addition to public ones was a different option

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
       

Total Seats: 535

no
 

Total Seats: 51

abstain
  

Total Seats: 113


Random fact: Submitting a bill without any proposals in it will not attract or detract voters. It will not raise your visibility or change your political position.

Random quote: "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong." - Voltaire

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 70