Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 01:09:53
Server time: 02:50:06, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Mity1 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Recreational Drug Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Democratic Socialist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2076

Description[?]:

So that police can concentrate on combatting the sale of the most damaging "A Class" drugs, we propose that soft drugs be made legal for those in good health and over 18.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:15:31, July 02, 2005 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Recreational Drug Act
MessageNO!

Date03:44:52, July 03, 2005 CET
FromNationalist Free-Market Republican Party
ToDebating the Recreational Drug Act
MessageAbsolutely not! Our children will get a hold of it and will destroy themselves! There is no such thing as a "soft drug!" They are ALL abominations in the eyes of God!

Date03:44:53, July 03, 2005 CET
FromNationalist Free-Market Republican Party
ToDebating the Recreational Drug Act
MessageAbsolutely not! Our children will get a hold of it and will destroy themselves! There is no such thing as a "soft drug!" They are ALL abominations in the eyes of God!

Date03:44:53, July 03, 2005 CET
FromNationalist Free-Market Republican Party
ToDebating the Recreational Drug Act
MessageAbsolutely not! Our children will get a hold of it and will destroy themselves! There is no such thing as a "soft drug!" They are ALL abominations in the eyes of God!

Date03:45:12, July 03, 2005 CET
FromNationalist Free-Market Republican Party
ToDebating the Recreational Drug Act
Message(sorry for the triple post, my rage made me click many times. :D )

Date14:26:42, July 03, 2005 CET
FromDemocratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the Recreational Drug Act
MessageI wonder what else your God finds an abomination...

Date17:40:03, July 03, 2005 CET
FromRepublican Party
ToDebating the Recreational Drug Act
MessageWe support this bill. This prohibition makes more evil then good. If this bill won. There will be a chance to move some police to take care real crimes. We don't see differences in drugs and alcohol or nicotine. There are all drugs. If someone is so 'stupid' to use it why help him?

Date18:23:55, July 03, 2005 CET
FromDemocratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the Recreational Drug Act
MessageMy God, agreeing with the Republican Party! I feel I've misunderstood you in the past!

Date02:52:09, July 04, 2005 CET
FromPatriot Party
ToDebating the Recreational Drug Act
MessageWe'll vote against this bill.

Date21:54:45, July 04, 2005 CET
FromRepublican Party
ToDebating the Recreational Drug Act
MessageTO: DSP Voting for this bill is our strategy in drug-war. We belive that more money from police go to prevention and education anti-drug system managed by private non-govs.

Date21:55:31, July 04, 2005 CET
FromRepublican Party
ToDebating the Recreational Drug Act
MessageTO: NFMRP if you don't teach your children you get that effect.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 63

no
     

Total Seats: 200

abstain
  

Total Seats: 36


Random fact: Any RP law granting extraordinary "emergency powers" or dictator-like powers to a government must be passed by at least a 2/3rds majority, but (like all RP laws) may always be overturned by a simple majority vote of the legislature.

Random quote: "There are many men of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle." - Alexis de Tocqueville

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 72