We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Recreational Drug Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Socialist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2076
Description[?]:
So that police can concentrate on combatting the sale of the most damaging "A Class" drugs, we propose that soft drugs be made legal for those in good health and over 18. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The recreational drug policy.
Old value:: Recreational drug use is forbidden.
Current: Recreational drug use is forbidden.
Proposed: The use of cannabis is legal.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:15:31, July 02, 2005 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Recreational Drug Act |
Message | NO! |
Date | 03:44:52, July 03, 2005 CET | From | Nationalist Free-Market Republican Party | To | Debating the Recreational Drug Act |
Message | Absolutely not! Our children will get a hold of it and will destroy themselves! There is no such thing as a "soft drug!" They are ALL abominations in the eyes of God! |
Date | 03:44:53, July 03, 2005 CET | From | Nationalist Free-Market Republican Party | To | Debating the Recreational Drug Act |
Message | Absolutely not! Our children will get a hold of it and will destroy themselves! There is no such thing as a "soft drug!" They are ALL abominations in the eyes of God! |
Date | 03:44:53, July 03, 2005 CET | From | Nationalist Free-Market Republican Party | To | Debating the Recreational Drug Act |
Message | Absolutely not! Our children will get a hold of it and will destroy themselves! There is no such thing as a "soft drug!" They are ALL abominations in the eyes of God! |
Date | 03:45:12, July 03, 2005 CET | From | Nationalist Free-Market Republican Party | To | Debating the Recreational Drug Act |
Message | (sorry for the triple post, my rage made me click many times. :D ) |
Date | 14:26:42, July 03, 2005 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Recreational Drug Act |
Message | I wonder what else your God finds an abomination... |
Date | 17:40:03, July 03, 2005 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the Recreational Drug Act |
Message | We support this bill. This prohibition makes more evil then good. If this bill won. There will be a chance to move some police to take care real crimes. We don't see differences in drugs and alcohol or nicotine. There are all drugs. If someone is so 'stupid' to use it why help him? |
Date | 18:23:55, July 03, 2005 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Recreational Drug Act |
Message | My God, agreeing with the Republican Party! I feel I've misunderstood you in the past! |
Date | 02:52:09, July 04, 2005 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the Recreational Drug Act |
Message | We'll vote against this bill. |
Date | 21:54:45, July 04, 2005 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the Recreational Drug Act |
Message | TO: DSP Voting for this bill is our strategy in drug-war. We belive that more money from police go to prevention and education anti-drug system managed by private non-govs. |
Date | 21:55:31, July 04, 2005 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the Recreational Drug Act |
Message | TO: NFMRP if you don't teach your children you get that effect. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 63 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 200 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 36 |
Random fact: Any RP law granting extraordinary "emergency powers" or dictator-like powers to a government must be passed by at least a 2/3rds majority, but (like all RP laws) may always be overturned by a simple majority vote of the legislature. |
Random quote: "There are many men of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle." - Alexis de Tocqueville |