We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Animal Regulation for Medical Uses
Details
Submitted by[?]: Freedom Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2076
Description[?]:
| We will set it to just some absic regulations to prevent abuse and misuse. We do not want overwhelming cruelty to animals. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in medical research.
Old value:: There are no restrictions on the use of animals for research.
Current: Animal research projects must apply for a license and submit to regulation.
Proposed: The use of animals in research is subject to basic regulations.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:50:11, July 03, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Alcoholic Par-tay | To | Debating the Animal Regulation for Medical Uses |
| Message | I'd prefer to keep it unregulated. |
| Date | 11:51:27, July 03, 2005 CET | From |  Freedom Party | To | Debating the Animal Regulation for Medical Uses |
| Message | The other options are worse regulation wise, we just want a compromise that the social democrats etc may be willing to accept. |
| Date | 13:29:16, July 03, 2005 CET | From | RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Animal Regulation for Medical Uses |
| Message | I'd be in favour of "Animal research projects must apply for a license and submit to regulation.", but I am willing to accept the current proposal as a compromise because it is a step in the right direction. |
| Date | 16:30:01, July 03, 2005 CET | From | Humanist Socialist Party | To | Debating the Animal Regulation for Medical Uses |
| Message | As RSDP said. |
| Date | 17:46:33, July 04, 2005 CET | From | Rodriquezland Party | To | Debating the Animal Regulation for Medical Uses |
| Message | Sounds fair enough although what RSDP said is a little more desirable. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 390 | |||||||
| no | Total Seats: 58 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 49 |
| Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
| Random quote: "Entrepreneurs are simply those who understand that there is little difference between obstacle and opportunity and are able to turn both to their advantage." - Niccolo Machiavelli |