Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:20:23
Server time: 19:39:36, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): AR Drax | itsmenotme | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Domestic Pets Protection Bill 2307

Details

Submitted by[?]: Royalist Democrat Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2309

Description[?]:

Allow local governments to monitor potential animal abuse/neglect by owners.

Allow local governments to monitor potentially aggressive animals.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:19:01, November 02, 2006 CET
FromConservative-Libertarian Party (UM)
ToDebating the Domestic Pets Protection Bill 2307
MessageAgain, why should I register the fact that I have a goldfish?!

Date10:30:38, November 02, 2006 CET
FromNational Party of Vensism
ToDebating the Domestic Pets Protection Bill 2307
MessageCause a goldfish is just like you a living creature. And we think even a goldfish should be treated with respect and care. This way we can be sure every animal is treated well enough.

And to ask a counter question.. why should i not register a large dog?

Date17:09:36, November 02, 2006 CET
FromConservative-Libertarian Party (UM)
ToDebating the Domestic Pets Protection Bill 2307
MessageBecause it's no business of the government as to who owns pets. Most animals will be registered with a vet anyway, and if there is some bad treatment going on, it won't take long for neighbours to find out. It does not need to be done through government.

Date02:29:51, November 05, 2006 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Domestic Pets Protection Bill 2307
MessageThis is completely pointless.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 25

no
    

Total Seats: 183

abstain
 

Total Seats: 42


Random fact: If you want to leave Particracy, please inactivate yourself on your user page to save the moderation team some time.

Random quote: "Politics: a strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. The conduct of public affairs for private advantage." - Ambrose Bierce

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55