Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:20:36
Server time: 20:39:23, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): chrismcsherbert | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Education Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Alliance 44

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2309

Description[?]:

/

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:51:05, November 02, 2006 CET
FromCommunist Workers Party
ToDebating the Education Act
MessageNo

Date17:51:25, November 02, 2006 CET
FromCommunist Workers Party
ToDebating the Education Act
MessageNo to a two tier education system

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 80

no
 

Total Seats: 20

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Particracy isn't just a game, it also has a forum, where players meet up to discuss role-playing, talk about in-game stuff, run their own newspaper or organisation and even discuss non-game and real-life issues! Check it out: http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia)

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 53