We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: CSP Call for early elections, September 2075
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Imperial Hobrazian Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill requests an early election. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline. Elections will be held immediately if the bill passes.
Voting deadline: November 2076
Description[?]:
| We, the Christian Socialist Party, call for early elections as soon as we can reach a consensus. |
Proposals
Article 1
Arrange early elections as soon as this bill passes.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:07:06, July 04, 2005 CET | From | National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the CSP Call for early elections, September 2075 |
| Message | To diffuse the confusion being caused by our inability to create a functioning cabinet without the EUP, perhaps it would be best to go ahead and call for early elections. What do you guys think? |
| Date | 23:09:10, July 04, 2005 CET | From | United Socialist Movement | To | Debating the CSP Call for early elections, September 2075 |
| Message | I would say it would be more effective to remove the EUP first if they are seen to be inactiv,e and then take it from there. |
| Date | 23:15:08, July 04, 2005 CET | From | National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the CSP Call for early elections, September 2075 |
| Message | Not a bad idea either. Which method would yield more expediant results? |
| Date | 23:15:20, July 04, 2005 CET | From | United Blobs | To | Debating the CSP Call for early elections, September 2075 |
| Message | The trouble is that the EUP are too active to go on inactivity mode but are likely to win similar numbers of seats as now. I'll support this after the current run of bills has gone through, though, as unless the EUP does more they'll get hit by the abstaining penalty which will help us all. |
| Date | 23:21:47, July 04, 2005 CET | From | National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the CSP Call for early elections, September 2075 |
| Message | Which is why it might be best in our interest to go ahead and have early elections. The EUP will be hit hard and a more rational cabinet can be formed. |
| Date | 23:22:57, July 04, 2005 CET | From | National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the CSP Call for early elections, September 2075 |
| Message | Ignore last post- I was just reiterating the UB's points. |
| Date | 02:21:20, July 05, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Liberal Party | To | Debating the CSP Call for early elections, September 2075 |
| Message | I agree with the UB. Will the call for early elections take eight(?) months like other bills? |
| Date | 02:28:43, July 05, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Liberal Party | To | Debating the CSP Call for early elections, September 2075 |
| Message | Just had a thought, do people think that the low turnout in the last few elections could be down to the largest party's relative inactivity? This could also explain the USM and LPU's impressive early showings, as they have been particularly active from the beginning. |
| Date | 08:24:52, July 05, 2005 CET | From | United Blobs | To | Debating the CSP Call for early elections, September 2075 |
| Message | The low turnout is due to the new parties. The USM and LPU probably did well due to being different to the other parties. The ealry election bll would pass as soon as we have a majority so I would put it to vote in a month or two to allow the latest bills to get through (deadlines for these is March 2076) |
| Date | 13:49:08, July 05, 2005 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the CSP Call for early elections, September 2075 |
| Message | This does, sadly, appear to be the only way to get a, possible, working government. We support... |
| Date | 14:09:57, July 05, 2005 CET | From |  Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the CSP Call for early elections, September 2075 |
| Message | The turnout was worse then last election. And I understand the need for a stable government so I'll support. But let's wait until the current bills that are up for vote are done first. |
| Date | 14:19:55, July 05, 2005 CET | From | United Blobs | To | Debating the CSP Call for early elections, September 2075 |
| Message | By the time the CSP comes on and puts it to vote and we vote for it they should be through. I just wish there was a better way to punish the EUP though. |
| Date | 14:50:41, July 05, 2005 CET | From | United Socialist Movement | To | Debating the CSP Call for early elections, September 2075 |
| Message | I think it's about time they were classified as inactive: I've seen almost no response from them the entire time I have been on Particracy. |
| Date | 14:59:01, July 05, 2005 CET | From | United Blobs | To | Debating the CSP Call for early elections, September 2075 |
| Message | You need to be inactive for 1 week to be put on inactive. They last logged on 2 days ago. They have voted on the bills in vote when they are online, they just don't debate or go online for all the bills that go to vote. |
| Date | 15:06:47, July 05, 2005 CET | From | United Socialist Movement | To | Debating the CSP Call for early elections, September 2075 |
| Message | It's been a year now. We will support the call for early elections. |
| Date | 18:04:59, July 05, 2005 CET | From | United Blobs | To | Debating the CSP Call for early elections, September 2075 |
| Message | It's ready to go to vote now. May this be the last time that an almost totally inactive party becomes HoS and largest party. |
| Date | 18:53:06, July 05, 2005 CET | From | Left Communist Party | To | Debating the CSP Call for early elections, September 2075 |
| Message | (cough) Almost? (cough) Totally? (cough) Inactive? |
| Date | 18:58:09, July 05, 2005 CET | From | United Blobs | To | Debating the CSP Call for early elections, September 2075 |
| Message | Maybe a bit of exaggeration... Seriously, the fact that you command >25% of the legislature makes any activity much more noticable and annoying for the rest of us. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 198 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 101 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 92 |
| Random fact: Before creating a party organisation, check to see whether there are any existing organisations which cover the same agenda. |
| Random quote: "There is no problem that cannot be solved with diplomacy or debate. Anyone who thinks otherwise does not need a gun, but a direct ride to a mental health clinic." - Ascentio Cartaginese, former Istalian politician |