We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Appropriate Nomenclature
Details
Submitted by[?]: Likaton Coalition of the Willing
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2314
Description[?]:
A bill to clearly recognise the Leader of our Nation |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Structure of the executive branch.
Old value:: The Head of State and Head of Government are two separate officials.
Current: The Head of State is also Head of Government.
Proposed: The Head of State is hereditary and symbolic; the Head of Government chairs the cabinet.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The title of the head of government, who chairs the cabinet.
Old value:: First Advocate
Current: Vice-President of Likatonia
Proposed: Chairman
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The formal title of the Head of State.
Old value:: Emissary
Current: President of Likatonia
Proposed: Emperor
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 14:30:26, November 15, 2006 CET | From | AM Radical Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Appropriate Nomenclature |
Message | This is yet another example of the mistrust of the people shown by all the actions of the so called Moral Reform Party! People of Likatonia, rise up against those who would put you in chains. We removed an emperor many years ago, do not allow another to rise from the ashes, like an evil phoenix! |
Date | 20:26:21, November 15, 2006 CET | From | Likaton Coalition of the Willing | To | Debating the Appropriate Nomenclature |
Message | Whilst it is true that the AMRLP have been a millstone around the necks of the Likaton peoples for too long, it does not befit a politician of this nation to make slanderous accusations, whilst all the while being associated with a (soon to be illegal) terrorist militia. It is unlikely anyone of reason will give this latest attempt by the AMRLP to derail the political process time or energy. |
Date | 21:02:45, November 15, 2006 CET | From | AM Radical Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Appropriate Nomenclature |
Message | We find it dangerously hypocritical for any politician who refers to another party as 'slave traders' to accuse another of slander. We of AMRLP have consistantly voted against any measure to reduce personal freedom, including the restoration of the slave trade. It is much more likely that the ImMoral Reform Party would be instituting slavery as its next reform. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 251 | ||
no | Total Seats: 248 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 2 |
Random fact: It is the collective responsibility of the players in a nation to ensure all currently binding RP laws are clearly outlined in an OOC reference bill in the "Bills under debate" section of the nation page. Confusion should not be created by displaying only some of the current RP laws or displaying RP laws which are no longer current. |
Random quote: "When I was a boy I was told that anybody could become President; I'm beginning to believe it." - Clarence Darrow |