We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Declaration of Support for the Legitimate Government of Kafuristan
Details
Submitted by[?]: Mutualist Party of Cildania
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2315
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the Declaration of Support for the Legitimate Government of Kafuristan. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Declaration of Support for the Legitimate Government of Kafuristan.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:35:41, November 15, 2006 CET | From |  Mutualist Party of Cildania | To | Debating the Ratification of the Declaration of Support for the Legitimate Government of Kafuristan |
| Message | I have used my Executive power as Head of State to propose this treaty. I trust it will have the support of the Senate, I wish to point out that it does not commit the Republic to take any military action and thus is in compliance with our current Neutrality declaration. Adrian Bertoni (President of the Cildanian Republic) |
| Date | 03:51:20, November 15, 2006 CET | From | Union for a Responsible Republic | To | Debating the Ratification of the Declaration of Support for the Legitimate Government of Kafuristan |
| Message | There is no reason for the Republic to ratify this treaty except for the desire of the Mutualist Party to erode our nation's neutrality and align the Republic with the Allied Nations. |
| Date | 04:13:41, November 15, 2006 CET | From | Divine Party of the Republic | To | Debating the Ratification of the Declaration of Support for the Legitimate Government of Kafuristan |
| Message | We cannot support this |
| Date | 11:26:42, November 15, 2006 CET | From | One Cildania Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Declaration of Support for the Legitimate Government of Kafuristan |
| Message | The OCP will be registering its vote against this proposal. The President appears to have his own party's wishes in proposing this motion rather than that of the Cildanian public. |
| Date | 12:00:21, November 15, 2006 CET | From | Mutualist Party of Cildania | To | Debating the Ratification of the Declaration of Support for the Legitimate Government of Kafuristan |
| Message | We are surprised by the OCP slur against our President, he was of course elected by the Cildanian People! He is merely bringing a matter forward which, contrary to the directions of the Senate, was not brought forward by the Minister concerned. Futhermore we are surprised by the current OCP position on this matter. The OCP is a member of the organisation 'Freedom Fighters of the World' an organisation which describes itself as an 'Organization of parties that support or fight for the freedom of opressed peoples around the world.' We would think that the people of Kafuristan would qualify as oppressed, suffering as they are beneath the jack-booted thugs of the Deltarian Empire! We hope that the OCP will reconsider its stance on this vital issue, vital not only to the Kafuristanis, but to peace loving people everywhere. |
| Date | 21:12:46, November 15, 2006 CET | From | One Cildania Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Declaration of Support for the Legitimate Government of Kafuristan |
| Message | If the Kafuristan Government wanted our support on the motion they should honour our neutrality proposal. If a country refuses to honour another country's pleas then we have no desire tohonour theirs. |
| Date | 08:26:22, November 16, 2006 CET | From | Mutualist Party of Cildania | To | Debating the Ratification of the Declaration of Support for the Legitimate Government of Kafuristan |
| Message | tit for tat? We didn't realise how 'principled' the OCP is... |
| Date | 11:11:30, November 16, 2006 CET | From | One Cildania Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Declaration of Support for the Legitimate Government of Kafuristan |
| Message | If that's what it takes |
| Date | 01:32:56, November 17, 2006 CET | From |  National Arab Party of Kafuristan | To | Debating the Ratification of the Declaration of Support for the Legitimate Government of Kafuristan |
| Message | How do we honor your neutrality proposal when we are not the internationally reconized government of Kafuristan? The internationally reconized government of Kafuristan is merely a puppet for a Deltarian slave empire. |
| Date | 03:37:11, November 17, 2006 CET | From | Union for a Responsible Republic | To | Debating the Ratification of the Declaration of Support for the Legitimate Government of Kafuristan |
| Message | It is not so much your nation honoring our neutrality treaty as the Economic Party explicitly stating that he, and by extension the Kafuristan government, would never recognize Cildanian neutrality. My decision to oppose this treaty is not based on quid pro quo, however. But I think it is not an inconceivable that parties would be hesitant to support the proposition of another party that has been somewhat hostile in the near past. |
| Date | 04:00:10, November 17, 2006 CET | From | Mutualist Party of Cildania | To | Debating the Ratification of the Declaration of Support for the Legitimate Government of Kafuristan |
| Message | Surely these are two seperate matters? They have no relationship to one another and should be treated seperately. If the LPs decision to oppose this treaty is not based on quid pro quo, what then is it based on? |
| Date | 17:26:29, November 17, 2006 CET | From | Union for a Responsible Republic | To | Debating the Ratification of the Declaration of Support for the Legitimate Government of Kafuristan |
| Message | It's based upon the precepts of Cildanian neutrality and the realities of the current international situation. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 183 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 189 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 53 |
| Random fact: Before creating a party organisation, check to see whether there are any existing organisations which cover the same agenda. |
| Random quote: "It is the hallmark of great society to debate and disagree without resorting to violence." - Mathew Jameson, former Hutorian politician |