Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5503
Next month in: 02:15:07
Server time: 21:44:52, June 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): j9999 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Education Freedom Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Fasco-Communist Order

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2315

Description[?]:

Parents should have the opportunity to send their children to the best schools in Terra, and the only way we will create the greatest schools is by forcing them to compete with each other for supremecy.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:20:37, November 16, 2006 CET
FromUnited Liberal Alliance
ToDebating the Education Freedom Bill
MessageYou have our support on this

Date12:01:24, November 16, 2006 CET
FromTelamon National Party
ToDebating the Education Freedom Bill
MessageThis is taking away the option of parents sending their children to public schools instead of private. We will vote against this bill like we have voted against most of your idiotic stupid and pathetic bills.

Date02:47:22, November 17, 2006 CET
FromNational Fasco-Communist Order
ToDebating the Education Freedom Bill
MessageThe TNP has again shown their immaturity to new ideas. It's laughable that they call themselves a political party.

Date02:49:40, November 17, 2006 CET
FromNational Fasco-Communist Order
ToDebating the Education Freedom Bill
MessageWe would move to make the entire education system private, but some stupid treaty we signed prohibits us.

Date07:21:55, November 17, 2006 CET
FromTelamon Royalist Party
ToDebating the Education Freedom Bill
MessageWe're with the Nationalists on this. This is a sick bill.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 31

no
     

Total Seats: 179

abstain
 

Total Seats: 28


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: “Their cheap talk of the 'greater good' is a thinly concealed excuse for subordinating the people to the institutionalized violence that is the state.” - Margaret Woodhall, former Dranian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 71