We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: No public higher education
Details
Submitted by[?]: Republican Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2077
Description[?]:
| We Republican Party don't belive in public scools. This should be the first step in changing our education system. Let us see how only private higher scools will work. We should change the system because it's ineffective. Public scools are worst rated and there is to many corruption in public higher education system. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The regulation of higher education.
Old value:: The government allows public and private higher education institutions to coexist with self-regulation for those that are private.
Current: The government allows public and private higher education institutions to coexist with self-regulation for those that are private.
Proposed: The government does not fund any public higher education institutions, permitting only private higher education institutions to exist.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:02:17, July 05, 2005 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the No public higher education |
| Message | We 100% oppose this bill. |
| Date | 23:35:15, July 05, 2005 CET | From | Inactive | To | Debating the No public higher education |
| Message | We are with PP ont his one |
| Date | 00:02:04, July 06, 2005 CET | From | Social Dynamist Party | To | Debating the No public higher education |
| Message | And how, exactly, are the poor to be given access to education? |
| Date | 00:20:40, July 06, 2005 CET | From | Nationalist Free-Market Republican Party | To | Debating the No public higher education |
| Message | You know, I don't like government control as much as the next right-minded person, but SDP has a point. Private schools cost a lot, and sometimes the government DOES have to intervene. |
| Date | 16:56:46, July 06, 2005 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the No public higher education |
| Message | NFMRP private scools cost a lot. What kind of argument is this. House cost a lot more then scool. DOES government have to intervene? BTW: Carol Marx way to destroy capitalism and make international socialism was to made government to intervene. If you realy are pro Free-Market you should read some Austriac's scool like Mises. The known truth is that public means worst and more expansive. If private scools cost a lot, how much the public higher education costs? Is it cheaper. We don't think so. |
| Date | 17:01:47, July 06, 2005 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the No public higher education |
| Message | SDP We propose education bond instad of political institution to distribute money to scools. We propose to commercialize all scools and give to all parrents equal bond. Money will be distributed no by institution but will go after students. More students - more money from government high scool will have. How about this idea? |
| Date | 18:07:10, July 06, 2005 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the No public higher education |
| Message | We call for a vote. |
| Date | 01:34:20, July 07, 2005 CET | From | Nationalist Free-Market Republican Party | To | Debating the No public higher education |
| Message | As this bill simply calls for the abolition of public schools and not a voucher program (which frankly, RP, isn't a bad idea -- me likes), We are against this bill. |
| Date | 01:02:21, July 08, 2005 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the No public higher education |
| Message | The Tribal Council has rejected this bill. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 217 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 63 |
| Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that. |
| Random quote: "Politicians are the same all over. They promise to build a bridge even where there is no river." Nikita Khrushchev (1894 - 1971) |