We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of October 2321
Details
Submitted by[?]: Johnson Democratic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2322
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Johnson Democratic Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Johnson Democratic Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Social Liberal Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Democratic Party of Dranland
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Johnson Democratic Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Social Liberal Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Democratic Party of Dranland
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Social Liberal Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Democratic Party of Dranland
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Social Liberal Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Social Liberal Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Johnson Democratic Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Social Liberal Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:08:54, November 30, 2006 CET | From | Order of Valtiel | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2321 |
| Message | How funny that your trying to ignore the largest party in power... |
| Date | 09:50:21, November 30, 2006 CET | From | Dranland Pro-Life Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2321 |
| Message | Uh... you do realise that even if all the parties |
| Date | 09:51:04, November 30, 2006 CET | From | Dranland Pro-Life Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2321 |
| Message | Uh... you do realise that even if all the parties to agree you still don't have a 1/2 majority, don't ya? |
| Date | 17:50:59, November 30, 2006 CET | From | Fascist Zealotry League | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2321 |
| Message | The JDP never was the sharpest tool in the box! It baffles us how the people of Dranland continue to put their faith in a party's presidential candidate when their legislative team fail to show even basic math skills! ;) |
| Date | 03:44:01, December 01, 2006 CET | From | Johnson Democratic Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2321 |
| Message | OOC: I have got AD/HD, it hurts my feelings when you call me stupid. J.J. Ardglass is stupid, not me. |
| Date | 13:36:50, December 01, 2006 CET | From | New Theta | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2321 |
| Message | OOC: Tell me you're kidding... |
| Date | 17:29:52, December 01, 2006 CET | From | Fascist Zealotry League | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2321 |
| Message | JJ. Ardglass was not the buffoon who came up with this Cabinet proposal, although by supporting it publically, he is just as idiotic as his JDP legislative team. Resign! Dranland is embarrassed to have him at the helm. |
| Date | 00:32:11, December 02, 2006 CET | From | Johnson Democratic Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2321 |
| Message | OOC: Tell me you're kidding...? Why? |
| Date | 02:52:58, December 02, 2006 CET | From | Johnson Democratic Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2321 |
| Message | OOC: A little bit of a misunderstanding. NVM I guess. |
| Date | 16:28:01, December 02, 2006 CET | From | New Theta | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2321 |
| Message | OOC: Inattention is not an "illness" or "disorder". What a cop-out. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 162 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 380 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 58 |
| Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map. |
| Random quote: "We have a culture, a strong, vibrant, 'real' culture. Most of the outside world does not. They haven't bled enough for it." - Lászlo Nádašdy, former Deltarian nobleman |