We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Identity Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Sekowan National Peace Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2322
Description[?]:
| Establishing a true Sekowan identity |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning granting citizenship.
Old value:: Citizenship is granted to all nationals.
Current: Citizenship is granted to all nationals.
Proposed: Citizenship is granted based on race/religion/gender.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government-issued identity card policy.
Old value:: Citizens are not issued with identity cards.
Current: All citizens are issued with identity cards but are not required to carry them.
Proposed: All citizens are issued with identity cards and are required to carry them at all times.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning granting nationality (national of this state without implication of having citizenship rights).
Old value:: Anyone receives nationality but immigrants must pass a test to gain nationality.
Current: Anyone is able to claim nationality.
Proposed: Only those born to nationals become nationals.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:41:26, November 30, 2006 CET | From |  Patria Para Todos | To | Debating the National Identity Bill |
| Message | No Pasaran! |
| Date | 23:35:32, November 30, 2006 CET | From | Cruzada Tradicionalista Sekowana | To | Debating the National Identity Bill |
| Message | Do I smell Deltarians? More frequent bathing would help. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 50 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 200 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator." - George W. Bush |