We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Act of Weapon
Details
Submitted by[?]: Gishoto Worker's Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2323
Description[?]:
this bill were made for safety country and prevention of weapon accidents |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Weapon concealment.
Old value:: People must first obtain a permit in order to carry concealed weapons.
Current: People must first obtain a permit in order to carry concealed weapons.
Proposed: Where weapons are carried, this must be done openly.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Ownership of guns by private individuals.
Old value:: Individuals are allowed to own firearms as long as they do not have a history of dangerous mental illness or a violent criminality.
Current: Adult individuals may not own firearms unless professionally required.
Proposed: Adult individuals may not own firearms unless professionally required.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Weapons allowed to private citizens.
Old value:: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Current: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Proposed: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, but these may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 00:07:33, December 02, 2006 CET | From | Gishoto Worker's Party | To | Debating the Act of Weapon |
Message | This bill may look like weird to other parties, so we'll debate enough about this bill |
Date | 01:09:50, December 02, 2006 CET | From | Refuge Pressure Party | To | Debating the Act of Weapon |
Message | We're happy with the first proposal, however we would prefer a middle approach to the the second one, where normal police carry non-lethal, but trained police can carry standard firearms. We wouldn't be happy with a situation where the general public can carry guns, but the police cannot. How about including a provision that only professionals can carry guns (not lawyers and bankers, people who need guns for their professions) |
Date | 06:14:05, December 02, 2006 CET | From | Gishoto Worker's Party | To | Debating the Act of Weapon |
Message | Thanks for your opinion, RPP. we'll fully care about your suggest |
Date | 14:17:23, December 02, 2006 CET | From | Refuge Pressure Party | To | Debating the Act of Weapon |
Message | We are not happy with the third proposal. The current law (Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.) is the strict one, you are proposing to make it easier for people to carry guns. However we will vote for this bill, as we believe the first two proposals are so important. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 219 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 412 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 119 |
Random fact: Players are expected to behave in a courteous, co-operative manner and make a reasonable effort to act with the consent of all players involved, even where the rules do not make consent strictly necessary. In particular, players have a responsibility to take reasonable care that other players are not misinformed either about the role-play or the Game Rules. |
Random quote: "If it were proved to me that in making war, my ideal had a chance of being realized, I would still say 'No' to war, for one does not create human society on mounds of corpses." - Louis Lecoin |