Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5475
Next month in: 02:34:58
Server time: 09:25:01, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Dx6743 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Omnibus VI of 2323

Details

Submitted by[?]: Malivia Democratic Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2324

Description[?]:

Omnibus

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:52:21, December 03, 2006 CET
FromLeviathan Party
ToDebating the Omnibus VI of 2323
MessageWe must ask the representatives from the MDP not to include proposals that are not related, as it makes voting on single bills difficult and often irrational.

Date14:52:22, December 03, 2006 CET
FromMalivia Democratic Party
ToDebating the Omnibus VI of 2323
MessageWe have a long tradition of having bills in Malivia that include unrelated proposals..as omnibus bills.

I feel its better to have several bills..having a few proposals each that can be negotiated..that it is to have three times as many bills with only one proposal.

Date13:53:20, December 04, 2006 CET
FromLeftsocialist Party
ToDebating the Omnibus VI of 2323
MessageNo.

Date15:24:40, December 04, 2006 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Omnibus VI of 2323
MessageWe cannot support either measure.
We have eliminated private cars from Malivia, due to their wasteful nature, both in pollutants and space needed to house them all, drive them everywhere.

The second article unnecessarily restricts our citizens.

Date16:10:05, December 04, 2006 CET
FromMalivia Democratic Party
ToDebating the Omnibus VI of 2323
MessageThe second article doesn't restrict citizens rights to show their religion. It only restricts public officials from showing their religion.

Separation of church and state.

Date20:18:06, December 04, 2006 CET
FromLeviathan Party
ToDebating the Omnibus VI of 2323
MessageRestricting the expression rights of our public officials borders on tyrannical. A person, regardless of profession, must be allowed to express their faith in a respectful and appropriate manner at all times. The symbols of a religion are one of the most basic forms of religious expression.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 3

no
    

Total Seats: 197

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: In cases where players have failed to clearly and accurately reference their nation's RP laws in the "Bills under debate" section, Moderation will rule them invalid if a challenge is made to their validity.

    Random quote: "It is not titles that honor men, but men that honor titles." - Niccolo Machiavelli

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 67