Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5573
Next month in: 03:13:16
Server time: 00:46:43, November 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Recreational Drug Decriminalization Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Pansexual Peace Party -- FNORD

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2077

Description[?]:

We see no reason why we must have a national law restricting recreational drug use. We feel that the local governments would be a much better choice to handle such a delicate policy.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:54:33, July 07, 2005 CET
FromConservative Neoliberalist Party
ToDebating the Recreational Drug Decriminalization Act
MessageFine by us

Date11:02:12, July 07, 2005 CET
FromNeo-Libertarian Party of Kalistan
ToDebating the Recreational Drug Decriminalization Act
MessageSure.

Date15:06:46, July 07, 2005 CET
FromBenevolent Totalitarian Party
ToDebating the Recreational Drug Decriminalization Act
MessageWe see a VERY good reason why we must have a national law restricting recreational drug use. They are addictive, harmful and potentially lethal.

Why exactly should we allow people to poison themselves? Because they want to? Well, if they want to, they are stupid, and they need to be educated.

Date15:07:32, July 07, 2005 CET
FromBenevolent Totalitarian Party
ToDebating the Recreational Drug Decriminalization Act
MessageStupid people need to be protected from themselves.

Date22:52:17, July 08, 2005 CET
FromPeople's Front of Kalistan
ToDebating the Recreational Drug Decriminalization Act
MessageThe DRP is a paradox.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 356

no
     

Total Seats: 394

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism").

    Random quote: "I am working for the time when unqualified blacks, browns, and women join the unqualified men in running our government." - Cissy Farenthold

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 61