We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Constitutional Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: True Valruzians
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2327
Description[?]:
| We propose to reduce the number of MP's to 100. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The total number of seats in the legislative assembly. Should be between 75 and 750.
Old value:: 201
Current: 300
Proposed: 100
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:46:37, December 05, 2006 CET | From | Dharma Commonwealth Party | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform |
| Message | What's your reasoning behind the reduction in FC seats TV? |
| Date | 11:46:17, December 05, 2006 CET | From | True Valruzians | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform |
| Message | We prefer smaller legislatures with fewer representatives. 100 is more than enough for Parliament to function, whilst ensuring a degree of proportionality. We do not like dead weight, and feel that there is little point is paying what are effectively bums on seats. |
| Date | 23:24:15, December 05, 2006 CET | From | Glorious Royal Party of Zuma | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform |
| Message | Agreed |
| Date | 11:55:26, December 08, 2006 CET | From | True Valruzians | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform |
| Message | I'll wait till the next parliament for a change |
| Date | 12:06:17, December 11, 2006 CET | From | Restoration Party | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform |
| Message | hmmm...we dont like...email me if you REALLY need me to change vote |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 46 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 106 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 49 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "If the Third World War is fought with nuclear weapons, the fourth will be fought with bows and arrows." - Louis Mountbatten |