We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Foreign Relations
Details
Submitted by[?]: Protectorate Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2325
Description[?]:
| Maliva should encourage diplomatic realtions with foreign powers, as well as permit free movement in and out of the nation. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change
The government's policy regarding foreign embassies.
Old value:: Foreign countries may establish an embassy after obtaining approval from the Foreign Office.
Current: Any other country may establish an embassy on national soil.
Proposed: Any other country may establish an embassy on national soil.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Travel by nationals to foreign nations
Old value:: The nation issues passports to nationals after a cursory security check.
Current: The nation issues passports to nationals after a cursory security check.
Proposed: The nation issues passports on demand for any reason to its nationals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:07:23, December 04, 2006 CET | From | Malivia Democratic Party | To | Debating the Foreign Relations |
| Message | No on all 3. Reason on 1: There are some countries that..it is in our best interest..not to have relations with due to their activities. Reason on 2: Issuing a passport to a fugitive from justice is not in Malivias best interest. Reason on 3: See Reason on 2. |
| Date | 20:24:10, December 04, 2006 CET | From | Leviathan Party | To | Debating the Foreign Relations |
| Message | These proposals would constitute a serious shift in Malivian foreign policy. We see definite advantages to these measures /if/ the international community agreed to recognize our neutrality in the same way Keymon's neutrality is internationally recognized. As it stands, we feel it is in our current interests to keep at least a minimum of scrutiny on visitors entering the country, be they diplomats or tourists. We support loosening of regulations for issuing passport to our citizens. |
| Date | 20:42:00, December 04, 2006 CET | From | Leftsocialist Party | To | Debating the Foreign Relations |
| Message | We are in favour of the current situation and so will vote no. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes |
Total Seats: 47 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 51 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 102 |
| Random fact: Moderation will not implement nation renaming requests where the proposed name does not comply with the requirements set out in the Nation Renaming Guide: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6364 |
| Random quote: "When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called 'the People's Stick.'" - Mikhail Bakunin |