We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ecological Priority (part 2)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hobrazian Peoples Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2325
Description[?]:
| We hope sense and economical responsibility has come to the parliament after the recent election. We need to consider these proposals. The HPP wish to change priority considering the money spent by our government. We wish to restructure the public sector and therefore propose these ammendments. The HPP has seen a lot of improvements in ecology over the years, but to a very expensive cost. Therefore we se an idea in letting go on some of the stances this parliament have had on ecology. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of endangered animals.
Old value:: Only zoos or zoological institutions are allowed to keep endangered animals; all other forms of keeping or trading in endangered animals are forbidden.
Current: Everyone may keep endangered animals, but the trade in, and the ownership of, endangered animals is strictly regulated by the government to prevent their extinction in the wild.
Proposed: Everyone may keep endangered animals, but the trade in, and the ownership of, endangered animals is strictly regulated by the government to prevent their extinction in the wild.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on tree plantation.
Old value:: The government does not intervene with regard to the replantation of trees.
Current: The government requires tree plantation at higher than replacement levels for all logging or clearance operations.
Proposed: The government discourages tree plantation.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:08:26, December 06, 2006 CET | From |  Marxist-Socialist Party of Hobrazia | To | Debating the Ecological Priority (part 2) |
| Message | We can accept article two. But we have to reject article one because it causes the extinction of the animal; because it backtracks on itself. |
| Date | 07:28:17, December 06, 2006 CET | From | National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the Ecological Priority (part 2) |
| Message | You want to repress our citizens, wreck our environment, and silence the voice of the people? Have you lost sight of what is important? Our citizens should always be our top priority. As treacherous as these times are with the FP spies, it should not become an excuse for an oppressive regime to manifest itself. |
| Date | 13:50:08, December 06, 2006 CET | From | Hobrazian Peoples Party | To | Debating the Ecological Priority (part 2) |
| Message | How will this be silencing the people? this is allwoing private citizens to keep endangered animals provided they take care of them approprately. |
| Date | 17:07:44, December 06, 2006 CET | From | National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the Ecological Priority (part 2) |
| Message | "How will this be silencing the people?" In other bills. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 211 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 147 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 42 |
| Random fact: http://www.fantasynamegenerators.com and http://www.behindthename.com/random are great resources for coming up with character names from unfamiliar cultures. |
| Random quote: "Whenever a separation is made between liberty and justice, neither, in my opinion, is safe." - Edmund Burke |