Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5476
Next month in: 01:06:16
Server time: 06:53:43, April 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Workers' Rights Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: People's Party of Rutania

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2325

Description[?]:

Article 1: Proposes that employers may only terminate strikers deemed to have left their positions for no reason, rather than the current ruling that they may be fired at any time for their actions, no matter how vaild the complaint(s).

Article 2: Promotes a worker's right to strike on behalf of his or her peers employed in similar industries across the nation who have initiated such actions for a just cause.

Article 3: Proposes that any worker has the right to vote no matter their occupation.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date04:18:57, December 06, 2006 CET
FromRutanian Conservative Party
ToDebating the Workers' Rights Act
MessageThe RFP agrees with this bill and will vote yes in it's current form.

Date12:21:09, December 06, 2006 CET
FromDemocratic Socialist's
ToDebating the Workers' Rights Act
MessageWe support this bill

Date16:43:15, December 06, 2006 CET
FromNational Radical Union
ToDebating the Workers' Rights Act
MessageThe National Reformist Union is opposed to such proposals.

Date00:58:30, December 07, 2006 CET
FromRutanian Conservative Party
ToDebating the Workers' Rights Act
MessageWhy is the NRU opposed to this proposal?

Date18:20:51, December 07, 2006 CET
FromNational Radical Union
ToDebating the Workers' Rights Act
MessageWe are opposed to what you propose simply because it impedes on employers' rights, and thus is a burden on the economy.

Date00:08:08, December 08, 2006 CET
FromRutanian Conservative Party
ToDebating the Workers' Rights Act
MessageSo you think that workers should be fired for going on strike for good reasons?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 227

no
  

Total Seats: 372

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: RP laws follow the same passing rules as in-game variable laws. Laws that are not of a constitutional nature require a simple majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. Laws that are of a constitutional nature require a 2/3 majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. RP laws may be abolished a simple majority vote this applies to ANY RP law.

Random quote: "The truth is that men are tired of liberty." - Benito Mussolini

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 67