Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5461
Next month in: 02:54:12
Server time: 21:05:47, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Maarten_saridan | Sevenberry | wstodden2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: February Thesis

Details

Submitted by[?]: Revolution Triguana

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2326

Description[?]:

Class War! Joooo kasdkfasdfakjldf halkdfh alkdfhl akdhflka sdhflk adhslkj alkdsfhalk hflkahdg kladhf klajfh lkalfk

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:39:57, December 08, 2006 CET
From TSDRP
ToDebating the February Thesis
MessageThis is as about as Anarchic as North Korea

Date19:40:50, December 08, 2006 CET
From TSDRP
ToDebating the February Thesis
MessageThis is about as anarchic as north korea*

Date04:28:15, December 09, 2006 CET
From Liberty Party
ToDebating the February Thesis
MessageWe agree with the TUP, these proposals are obviously contradictory to anarchism. If you FORCE people against their will to be members of an organisation that they oppose, you are imposing rules on them. By being the party imposing the rules you are positioning yourself as a RULER (and a thoroughly evil one at that). Rulers (especially despotic dictators) are not consistent with anarchy. Of course, I guess anarcho-socialist has a nicer ring to it than totalitarian-dictator, so I can sympathise with your desire to describe yourself the way you do.

We find it also interesting that you claim to oppose class oppression when you freely concede to support class WARFARE at the head of this bill. Surely class warfare is the deliberate attempt by one class to, by force of arms, impose their will on, and against the will of, another class. Is this not the very definition of oppression? And if it is done by one class against another class, surely this is 'class oppression'?

Oh, and incidentally, these are bad policies.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
   

Total Seats: 453

abstain
  

Total Seats: 102


Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map.

Random quote: "If we were to wake up some morning and find that everyone was the same race, creed and color, we would find some other causes for prejudice by noon." - George Aiken

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 59