We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: February Thesis
Details
Submitted by[?]: Revolution Triguana
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2326
Description[?]:
| Class War! Joooo kasdkfasdfakjldf halkdfh alkdfhl akdhflka sdhflk adhslkj alkdsfhalk hflkahdg kladhf klajfh lkalfk |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on advertising
Old value:: All advertising is permitted.
Current: All advertising is permitted.
Proposed: All advertising is prohibited.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards labor unions.
Old value:: Trade unions may exist and worker membership is voluntary.
Current: Trade unions may exist and worker membership is voluntary.
Proposed: Trade unions may exist and all workers must have membership in one.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Waste disposal responsibility.
Old value:: Waste disposal is left entirely to the private sector but is regulated.
Current: The government is responsible for waste disposal.
Proposed: The government is responsible for waste disposal.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:39:57, December 08, 2006 CET | From |   TSDRP | To | Debating the February Thesis |
| Message | This is as about as Anarchic as North Korea |
| Date | 19:40:50, December 08, 2006 CET | From | TSDRP | To | Debating the February Thesis |
| Message | This is about as anarchic as north korea* |
| Date | 04:28:15, December 09, 2006 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the February Thesis |
| Message | We agree with the TUP, these proposals are obviously contradictory to anarchism. If you FORCE people against their will to be members of an organisation that they oppose, you are imposing rules on them. By being the party imposing the rules you are positioning yourself as a RULER (and a thoroughly evil one at that). Rulers (especially despotic dictators) are not consistent with anarchy. Of course, I guess anarcho-socialist has a nicer ring to it than totalitarian-dictator, so I can sympathise with your desire to describe yourself the way you do. We find it also interesting that you claim to oppose class oppression when you freely concede to support class WARFARE at the head of this bill. Surely class warfare is the deliberate attempt by one class to, by force of arms, impose their will on, and against the will of, another class. Is this not the very definition of oppression? And if it is done by one class against another class, surely this is 'class oppression'? Oh, and incidentally, these are bad policies. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 453 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 102 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "Blah blah blah- I'm more of a Leftist than all you puppets... You support cops beating people down and kicking out all the foreigners..." - Omar al-Khali, former Kalistani politician |