We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Clyrvská 2
Details
Submitted by[?]: Clyrvská Dynastia
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2328
Description[?]:
For visibility |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Current: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Proposed: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Weapons allowed to private citizens.
Old value:: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Current: Citizens may own any type of weapon. They may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Proposed: Citizens may own any type of weapon. They may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 15:12:49, December 11, 2006 CET | From | Marxist-Socialist Party of Hobrazia | To | Debating the Clyrvská 2 |
Message | We do not agree with any of these suggestions. |
Date | 15:37:27, December 11, 2006 CET | From | Clyrvská Dynastia | To | Debating the Clyrvská 2 |
Message | Seeing as the other's are putting things straight to vote, why should we be constrained by your bureaucratic measures when current established polticians can break them? |
Date | 15:49:00, December 11, 2006 CET | From | Hobrazian Peoples Party | To | Debating the Clyrvská 2 |
Message | Well it also seems as it is a method taken by the smaller parties, not used to parliamentary participation. But hopefully they can be reschooled when experiencing parliament time ;-) |
Date | 15:50:15, December 11, 2006 CET | From | Clyrvská Dynastia | To | Debating the Clyrvská 2 |
Message | We just want our visibility to rise. Then we have no problem with delays. |
Date | 15:54:47, December 11, 2006 CET | From | Marxist-Socialist Party of Hobrazia | To | Debating the Clyrvská 2 |
Message | Doesn't ones visibility rise anyway in whatever they vote for?? |
Date | 16:05:27, December 11, 2006 CET | From | Hobrazian Peoples Party | To | Debating the Clyrvská 2 |
Message | @CD: Thats why i didn't bitch out ;-) your excused. think i did my self in the old days.... |
Date | 10:20:34, December 12, 2006 CET | From | Clyrvská Dynastia | To | Debating the Clyrvská 2 |
Message | MSPH - It doesn't affect it ultimately, but the quicker the better as far as I'm concerned. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 145 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 255 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Once approved, players should copy Cultural Protocols into a bill in the debate section of their nation page, under the title of "OOC: Cultural Protocols". This bill should include links to the passed Cultural Protocol bill and the Moderation approval. |
Random quote: "Even when laws have been written down, they ought not always to remain unaltered." - Aristotle |