We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Contraception Subsidization Reform 2077

Details

Submitted by^[?]: Federalist Labour Party

Status^[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2087

Description^[?]:

Lets reform the current law so to cut back on waste of state revenue.

Proposals

Article 1

Proposal^[?] to change Government policy on subsidising contraception.

Old value:: The government offers free contraceptives in pharmacies and public toilets.

Current: The government does not supply free or discounted contraceptives.

Proposed: The government subsidises a considerable discount for contraceptives.

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date	21:44:09, July 08, 2005 CET
From	Kirlawa Green Party
To	Debating the Contraception Subsidization Reform 2077
Message	the current policy is working fine. It's the only way we can reduce aids contaminations...

Date	21:59:02, July 08, 2005 CET
From	Federalist Labour Party
To	Debating the Contraception Subsidization Reform 2077
Message	Public schools provide informative sexual education. Considerable discount in price of contraception is more than antiquate.

Date	17:04:52, July 11, 2005 CET
From	Theofascist Party
To	Debating the Contraception Subsidization Reform 2077
Message	Yet at the same time you wish to abolish compulsory schooling? How will you provide sexual education to the kids if they don't go to school? (OOC: I think "adequate" is the word you're looking for...)

Date	16:00:46, July 13, 2005 CET
From	Kirlawa Green Party
To	Debating the Contraception Subsidization Reform 2077
Message	exactly, and providing a discount just isn't enough! Do you really think lowering the price of contraceptives by a few cents will have an effect?

Date	20:44:15, July 15, 2005 CET
From	Federalist Labour Party
To	Debating the Contraception Subsidization Reform 2077
Message	How does "considerable discount" imply a mere few cents? And, WDP, it doesn't matter, it is not right to FORCE people to be educated!

Date	21:12:11, July 15, 2005 CET
From	Kirlawa Green Party
To	Debating the Contraception Subsidization Reform 2077
Message	it isn't? So you're fine with acountry filled with uneducated morons?

Date	21:12:44, July 15, 2005 CET
From	Kirlawa Green Party
To	Debating the Contraception Subsidization Reform 2077
Message	if I follow your logic I can easily say you can't force people not to kill other people or steal from them

Date	21:37:34, July 15, 2005 CET
From	Federalist Labour Party
To	Debating the Contraception Subsidization Reform 2077
Message	Look up the word "considerable" and you will find it does not mean few, little or nothing. And about compulsory education...as I stated before, the reason public education was introduced in the first place was because, the vast majority of citizens wanted to be educated! So, to say or imply that the country would be filled with "uneducated morons" in the case compulsory education was abolished is ridiculous. Murder and stealing (haha you're talking about stealing!) harms other people, unlike choosing to be educated, which is family or personal decision.

Date	23:11:58, July 19, 2005 CET
From	Kirlawa Green Party
To	Debating the Contraception Subsidization Reform 2077
Message	so you're telling me you would let parents choose for their children if they have to be educated or not? If your parents choose not to educate you then that's final? You will go through life as an illiterate?

Date	16:47:58, July 21, 2005 CET
From	Kirlawa Freedom Party
To	Debating the Contraception Subsidization Reform 2077
Message	We prefer to keep the old bill, as this way we can save on medical costs. We also still believe that children should go to school until the age of 16, and have acces to College at low costs.

Date	07:38:33, July 23, 2005 CET
From	Federalist Labour Party
To	Debating the Contraception Subsidization Reform 2077
Message	Where do you draw the line? Why stop at education? How about enforcing healthy eating habits, exercise schedules or even condom use for all the kiddies? Either the parents are indeed the parents, or...

Date	16:48:22, July 28, 2005 CET
From	Federalist Labour Party
To	Debating the Contraception Subsidization Reform 2077
Message	Lower the strain on the healthcare system. Sex is a personal decision.

Date	16:52:18, July 28, 2005 CET
From	Federalist Labour Party
To	Debating the Contraception Subsidization Reform 2077
Message	Educate...don't throw money at the problem.

Date	16:59:53, July 28, 2005 CET
From	Kirlawa Green Party
To	Debating the Contraception Subsidization Reform 2077
Message	without compulsory education that might be problematic!

Date	17:02:08, July 28, 2005 CET
From	Federalist Labour Party
To	Debating the Contraception Subsidization Reform 2077
Message	There are other ways to educate or promote safe sex...just look at the private sector in the united states...

Date	17:48:52, July 28, 2005 CET
From	Kirlawa Freedom Party
To	Debating the Contraception Subsidization Reform 2077
Message	That is an example I would not want to follow....

Date	18:04:21, July 28, 2005 CET
From	Federalist Labour Party
To	Debating the Contraception Subsidization Reform 2077
Message	Why?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote

Seats

yes

Federalist Labour Party (39)

Total Seats: 39

Total Seats: 200

abstain

Isilia Party (61)
Conservative Party (0)

Total Seats: 61

Random fact: The forum contains a lot of useful information, it has updates to the game, role playing between nations, news and discussion. http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "I do not believe that the United States should be bound by the same rules as the smallest African nation. Life isn't like that." - Richard Perle

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 73