We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Adoption Restriction
Details
Submitted by[?]: Republican Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2081
Description[?]:
| We Republican Party belive that family (man and woman) is a root of Our great nation. Adopted children should have same start as other childrens. This is the reason why we introduce this bill. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning who can proceed with adoption; in case adoption is legal.
Old value:: Only heterosexual couples and singles may adopt children.
Current: Only heterosexual couples may adopt children.
Proposed: Only heterosexual couples may adopt children.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:47:39, July 11, 2005 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Adoption Restriction |
| Message | We will say no to this. I can also lay you odds that this won't be passed either. |
| Date | 17:21:36, July 12, 2005 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the Adoption Restriction |
| Message | RP Why you always against me? You breaking my heart. |
| Date | 00:40:43, July 13, 2005 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Adoption Restriction |
| Message | Because I dn't support what you are proposing. Sorry if it breaks your heart Republican Party. However, we feel that singles should also be allowed to adopt. |
| Date | 09:31:48, July 13, 2005 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the Adoption Restriction |
| Message | Can we trade your position for support on your bill ? |
| Date | 15:52:56, July 13, 2005 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Adoption Restriction |
| Message | Its already that way Rep Party so the answer is no. |
| Date | 19:11:09, July 13, 2005 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the Adoption Restriction |
| Message | Why no? It's something personal? Is there nothing you want to change in our magnificent country? |
| Date | 23:54:53, July 13, 2005 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Adoption Restriction |
| Message | 1. why no? Because it is our belief that singles as well as a married couple should have the right to adopt! 2. It's something personal? Yes it is. I won't tell you why because it is personal. 3. Is there nothing you want to change in our magnificent country? I've changed a few things as has everyone here. |
| Date | 18:53:53, July 16, 2005 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the Adoption Restriction |
| Message | This bill has been rejected by the Tribal Council. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 61 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 163 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 75 |
| Random fact: You can view helpful ideological statistics about the regions in your nation on the region pages. You can also view detailed political opinions and the importance of them there as well. |
| Random quote: "Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon so long as there is no answer to it gives claws to the weak." - George Orwell |