We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: NATO alignment declaration
Details
Submitted by[?]: Republican Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2084
Description[?]:
| We free people of United Tribes of Tukarali belive in free market, free speech and democracy creating this international military alignment to better protect our values. Co-opting of new members is made by Tribal Council. Minister responsible for NATO is Defense Minister. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:47:12, July 11, 2005 CET |
From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the NATO alignment declaration | | Message | I have to echo my colleague from the DSP. We have very little information on this and we require more before we make a decision. |
| Date | 22:23:02, July 11, 2005 CET |
From | Republican Party | To | Debating the NATO alignment declaration | | Message | Rightist Party this is the debate. What is your proposition?
SDP: We Republican Party and Our Heiry Chief George Bush Junior have made some activity on this field. As the lider of our magnificient country, I'm asking you for help to find Nations which belive in democracy, free market and free speech to co-operate. I've made contact we Republic of Endralon (aka Socialist Commonwealth of Endralon). We have good relationships. |
| Date | 09:19:44, July 12, 2005 CET |
From | Republican Party | To | Debating the NATO alignment declaration | | Message | We Republican Party propose Article 1. "NATO means New Age Treatry Organisation".
We see NATO as group of Nations working, fighting if must against global terrorists. |
| Date | 16:02:02, July 12, 2005 CET |
From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the NATO alignment declaration | | Message | Here's a hint, place this treaty on the forums and see where it leads. Frankly, we have very little information on this and I feel that we really don't need this treaty at this paricular moment. |
| Date | 16:52:53, July 12, 2005 CET |
From | Inactive | To | Debating the NATO alignment declaration | | Message | NO! New Age?DVA opposes this. We also oppose alligning ourselves with Socialist NATION outside of Tukarali. |
| Date | 00:39:17, July 13, 2005 CET |
From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the NATO alignment declaration | | Message | My proposition is that you need more info than what you have. A treaty is either bi-national or multinational. Since our beloved Defense Minister is absent, I suggest we table this discussion until he returns. |
| Date | 09:30:21, July 13, 2005 CET |
From | Republican Party | To | Debating the NATO alignment declaration | | Message | Rightist Party lets be more enterprising and switch round your question.
What do you want to have in this Declaration? |
| Date | 23:16:05, July 16, 2005 CET |
From | Social Dynamist Party | To | Debating the NATO alignment declaration | | Message | ReP, if you want a treaty, presumably you have some idea what it would involve? It's a little presumptious to say "We need a treaty" then expect others to come up with what on earth the treaty is going to consist of.
How about...
"The New Artichoke and Turnip Organisation is to be a social union of member-states, in which there is to be freedom of movement by all vegetables across borders, regardless of gender, age, or colour. All signatory members undertake to provide at least one bowl of cooked green vegetables daily on demand to any citizen of the NATO member-states. Theft of root vegetables is to be punished in all member-states by a fine of no less than fourteen ounces of purple sprouting, or twenty ounces of curly greens, and in addition to any other penalties at the discretion of said states. No member-state shall permit the taxation, by national or regional government, or by any other official body, of tubers." |
subscribe to this discussion -
unsubscribeVoting
| Vote |
Seats |
| yes | Total Seats: 0 |
| no | Total Seats: 183 |
| abstain | Total Seats: 116 |
| Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with. |
| Random quote: "Don't listen to what the Communists say, but look at what they do." - Nguyen Van Thieu |