Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 03:36:25
Server time: 00:23:34, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): Arusu-Gad | dannypk19 | ImperialLodamun | JourneyJak | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of March 2079

Details

Submitted by[?]: Social Conservative Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2079

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:26:15, July 11, 2005 CET
FromSocial Conservative Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2079
MessageI'm sorry for my chosen coalition partners, but there isn't much time for negotiating anymore before the next elections. Can't help it that I couldn't get in for so long.

When including the head of state I divided positions 4-4-3, which is fair according to the election results in my opinion.

Date21:29:14, July 11, 2005 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2079
MessageI see you've decided to let everyone in. </sarcasm>

Date23:36:50, July 11, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2079
Messagesame here. I agree only because this game server was down for few days.

Date23:49:49, July 11, 2005 CET
FromSocial Conservative Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2079
MessageA government is not about letting everyone in, it's about creating a workable majority.

Date23:58:28, July 11, 2005 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2079
MessageTyranny of the majority.

Date01:23:27, July 12, 2005 CET
From Fair Capitalism Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2079
MessageMay I just point out that we have served as a good Foreign Ministry a long time, and I've been on holiday putting my representation down, and therefore this is a flawed cabinet.

Date18:11:58, July 12, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2079
MessageFCP: as flawed as when I was inactive for few days way back and you didn't oppose that I had not been in government

Date19:04:31, July 12, 2005 CET
From Fair Capitalism Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2079
MessageYou didn't say. That was a great shame, you were and still are a good party. At least you're back like it was now.

Speaking of which, you're the only party left from the time around when I joined, now AGSP's away for a few months. Aloria sure has changed.

Date23:14:52, July 12, 2005 CET
From Neoliberal Conservatives
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2079
Messageto me this seems fair..

we would be delighted to take up the responsibilities of Economic affairs, Defence and education

Date23:19:34, July 12, 2005 CET
From Fair Capitalism Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2079
MessageWell, I think it's rediculous the foreign minister that ended the Kurmal conflict after decades of bickering is voted out because of OOC reasons.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 217

no
    

Total Seats: 177

abstain
 

Total Seats: 6


Random fact: Cultural Protocols should generally be reflective of RP conducted within the nation and should not significantly alter or modify the ethnic, religious or linguistic composition without considerable and reasonable role-play or other justification.

Random quote: "Were it not for electricity, we would have to watch television in the dark." - Muammar Gaddafi-

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 66