We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Civil Liberties Act 2332
Details
Submitted by[?]: Marxist-Socialist Party of Hobrazia
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2333
Description[?]:
| Civil liberties act to bring Hobrazia into the 24th century with progressive human rights legislation |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The confidentiality of letters and correspondence.
Old value:: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate the confidentiality of letters with grounded cause.
Current: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate it in extreme situations.
Proposed: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate it in extreme situations.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Displays of public affection and obscenity laws.
Old value:: There are no laws regarding obscene public acts.
Current: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Proposed: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Women's working rights.
Old value:: Women are entitled the same working rights as men.
Current: Women are entitled the same working rights as men.
Proposed: Women are not allowed to perform potentially dangerous tasks.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:24:35, December 21, 2006 CET | From | Hobrazian Peoples Party | To | Debating the Civil Liberties Act 2332 |
| Message | How can article 2 be progressive to the current law? |
| Date | 21:24:59, December 21, 2006 CET | From | Hobrazian Peoples Party | To | Debating the Civil Liberties Act 2332 |
| Message | The same with article 3 |
| Date | 23:21:33, December 21, 2006 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the Civil Liberties Act 2332 |
| Message | This isn't Marxist, it isn't even socialist... |
| Date | 08:13:35, December 22, 2006 CET | From | HSP (Hobrazian Socialist Party) | To | Debating the Civil Liberties Act 2332 |
| Message | Nor even rationale. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 121 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 272 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "This country has far more problems than it deserves and far more solutions than it applies." - Ralph Nader |