We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Chemical Weapons Sensibility Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progressive Conservatives
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2333
Description[?]:
| It is illegal for our nation to use Chemical, Biological, or Radiological weapons in combat, yet we continue to allow their development and research, the law should not be contradictatory, and thus should be amended. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning biological and chemical weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, construct and store biological and chemical weapons.
Current: The nation reserves the right to develop, construct and store biological and chemical weapons.
Proposed: The nation shall never purchase, produce, or store biological or chemical weaponry, for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:42:52, December 22, 2006 CET | From | National Capitalism Party | To | Debating the Chemical Weapons Sensibility Act |
| Message | No. This will leave us undefended. |
| Date | 21:14:16, December 22, 2006 CET | From | Progressive Conservatives | To | Debating the Chemical Weapons Sensibility Act |
| Message | No it will not as chemical weapons are banned in warfare. |
| Date | 22:11:46, December 22, 2006 CET | From | United Christian Democrats | To | Debating the Chemical Weapons Sensibility Act |
| Message | We agree. The law as it stands is rather confusing and contradictory. |
| Date | 22:49:12, December 22, 2006 CET | From | Orange Party | To | Debating the Chemical Weapons Sensibility Act |
| Message | I cannot support this. |
| Date | 22:49:28, December 22, 2006 CET | From | Orange Party | To | Debating the Chemical Weapons Sensibility Act |
| Message | Typo: I CAN support this. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 165 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 50 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 35 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "Democracy is more dangerous than fire. Fire can't vote itself immune to water." - Michael Z. Williamson |