We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Big Government reduction and Freedom Protection Act pt. 2
Details
Submitted by[?]: Revolutionary Freedom Party -- KEG SLAM
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2336
Description[?]:
Again, what's next, the government deciding what we can and cannot have for breakfast? Government madated diets? |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change
Scope of food ingredient labeling (if present).
Old value:: All ingredients and corresponding nutritional information must be listed.
Current: All ingredients must be listed.
Proposed: All ingredients must be listed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:49:14, December 27, 2006 CET | From | TomasianDouglasian Party | To | Debating the Big Government reduction and Freedom Protection Act pt. 2 |
Message | The rhetoric of desperation and exageration continues from the RFP. Having appropriate labelling does not in any way tell us what to eat. Don't be fooled by the political machinations of the RFP just prior to an election. |
Date | 16:20:34, December 28, 2006 CET | From | People's Front of Kalistan | To | Debating the Big Government reduction and Freedom Protection Act pt. 2 |
Message | I would like to see how many points my hamburger is worth. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 218 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 397 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with. |
Random quote: "A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven." - Jean Chretien (describing the level of proof about weapons of mass destruction that Canada required to join the Iraq War) |