Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5575
Next month in: 00:33:12
Server time: 11:26:47, November 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of April 2340

Details

Submitted by[?]: Falanges Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2341

Description[?]:

This proposal is very important. it is time for our very beloved Holy Empire to have a governement that is truly representative of the people. the actual governement can't stay like it is. i propose that all the parties take a deep look at the details and portfolios in this cabinet.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:27:01, January 06, 2007 CET
FromSpiritualists' National Union
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2340
MessageThis would hand most of our government's Cabinet portfolios over to the extremists. We cannot support this.

Date13:35:25, January 06, 2007 CET
FromFalanges Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2340
MessageSo the Republican Brotherhood Party is now an extremist?
Is this your opinion about the RBP or is it a contradictory statement?

Date13:45:44, January 06, 2007 CET
FromSpiritualists' National Union
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2340
MessageIf you read my statement properly you would have noted the word "most". For the record, when I used the term "extremists" I was referring particularly to the Rednecks and Imperialists, and to a slightly lesser extent to the Unionist Party. As to yourselves, your party strikes us as pretty barmy too!

Date13:57:14, January 06, 2007 CET
FromFalanges Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2340
MessageI will take that as a compliement because an insult from a party like yours is considered as a compliment for me. Concerning your "Global evaluation" for the other parties, i 'll keep for them to respond, although i think that you do not deserve that some respectful parties respond to your insults.


Date18:19:05, January 06, 2007 CET
FromChristian People's Party (IA)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2340
MessageWe can support this cabinet. And like we have said before we do not belong to any "bloc" and we take offence to anybody that insinuate that we do. We are willing to work with anybody from the "Spiritualists" to the "Imperialists" as long we are given a fair representation in the national cabinet.

Date19:36:12, January 06, 2007 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2340
MessageAlthough we usually gun for Defence, Foreign Affairs, Agriculture and the Environment portfolios we feel the current members of "His Majesty's Government" need to be removed as soon as possible and will fully support this then haggle for a better deal at a later stage.

Date21:09:24, January 06, 2007 CET
FromSpiritualists' National Union
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2340
MessageWe call on our Republican friends to look long and hard at the parties they are about to propel into power, and reconsider their support for this Cabinet proposal.

Date21:09:46, January 06, 2007 CET
FromFalanges Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2340
MessageLong Live the Holy Empire!!!!!!!!!!!!!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 62

no
  

Total Seats: 24

abstain
 

Total Seats: 14


Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play".

Random quote: “Where would the weapons and equipment come from once you've banned the defence industry? Will we be defended by all your hippy people hurling potatoes and cabbages?” - Margaret Woodhall, former Dranian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 69