Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:55:55
Server time: 19:04:04, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): ImperialLodamun | Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Lower the Gates

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberty Party of Saridan

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2083

Description[?]:

As citizens of Saridan, our people have a right to choose where they live, what car they drive, and so much more. Yet currently we deny them the right to feel safe at night while they sleep with their children in the next room. It's time we say no to injustice and allow our wonderful citizens to sleep soundly if that is what they so desire.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:18:59, July 14, 2005 CET
From Commercial Freedom
ToDebating the Lower the Gates
MessageWe agree, people should have the right to pay extra for security. There shouldn't be any reason to ban people from choosing to live where they want.

Date17:31:16, July 14, 2005 CET
From Enlightened Socialist Party
ToDebating the Lower the Gates
MessageThis denys people the right to choose where they wish to live, and creates racism, hatred, and fear. Is Saridan a nation to be ruled in cloisters of xenophobia and disgust? We think not. Whilst there are possibly in perhaps a hundredth of cases legitimate reasons for these communities to be created, the other 99% will simply be from racism or hate, and thus we oppose.

Date19:23:06, July 14, 2005 CET
From United Democratic Alliance
ToDebating the Lower the Gates
MessageWe don't support the idea of the Govt setting up Gated Communities, but support the private sector.

Date20:43:21, July 14, 2005 CET
From Liberty Party of Saridan
ToDebating the Lower the Gates
MessageWe see the UDA's point of how the Government could lead to some corruption and problems with alloting tax money so we have amended the bill.

Date02:21:47, July 15, 2005 CET
From freedom party
ToDebating the Lower the Gates
MessageWe believe that all citizens have the right to live how and where they wish. Including the gating of communities.
It is not the job of government to socially engineer what we desire. However we do not support the government involvement. This is a private sector issue.

Date02:43:06, July 15, 2005 CET
From Slytherius Party
ToDebating the Lower the Gates
MessageYes please, for the sake of safety, private gated communities should be allowed.

Date18:19:08, July 15, 2005 CET
From Enlightened Socialist Party
ToDebating the Lower the Gates
MessageAll citizens have a right to live how and where they wish, which is destroyed by the concept of a gated community! These will not be formed to stop criminals, but to keep the blacks/jews/muslims/sikhs/christians out. And that is racism and hatred, pure and simple.

Date14:45:05, July 16, 2005 CET
From Commercial Freedom
ToDebating the Lower the Gates
MessageI might have misunderstood the term "Gated Community". Please include a definition so there is no confusion. I merely thought they were communities with extra security.

Date15:06:00, July 16, 2005 CET
From Commercial Freedom
ToDebating the Lower the Gates
MessageNever mind, I was right. I found the definition: In its modern form, a gated community is a form of closed community, characterized by a controlled entrance for pedestrians, bicycles, and automobiles, usually staffed by full-time, private security guards, that leads into one or more small residential streets, with walls or fences surrounding the perimeter of the entire development. Many gated communities have various amenities which make it possible for residents to stay within the community for day-to-day activities.

Date15:09:11, July 16, 2005 CET
From Commercial Freedom
ToDebating the Lower the Gates
MessageThought despite this I agree with ESP and I now am against. Before it didn't occur to me that people may make gated communities because of racial issues. In an attempt to lower racial issues in Saridan we oppose.

Date18:15:42, July 16, 2005 CET
From LCS Christian Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Lower the Gates
MessageWe are in favor, despite the incredibly stupid racial arguments that have been forth. People in Saridan want to shut crime out.

Date12:38:38, July 17, 2005 CET
From Enlightened Socialist Party
ToDebating the Lower the Gates
MessageThese 'gated communities' will just be cliques used to project power and restrict the freedoms of others. Crime would be slightly reduced in these areas, but it would also be used to turn away 'undesirables' from these communities, which would purely be used to keep the blacks/jews/muslims/sikhs/christians out. This bill CANNOT GO AHEAD IF WE WISH TO BE A FREE AND FAIR SOCIETY.

Date20:14:22, July 18, 2005 CET
From Liberty Party of Saridan
ToDebating the Lower the Gates
MessageThis bill MUST go ahead for Saridan to be a free society. People have a basic right to choose where they live and how they live and it shouldn't even be up to the government to determine whether or not they may live in a community with added security!

Date00:24:11, July 19, 2005 CET
From freedom party
ToDebating the Lower the Gates
MessageRacism being brought into the issue is shameful.
You are determining motive with no evidence or justification. It is shameful.
The freedom party whole heartedly supports this bill.

Date02:11:49, July 19, 2005 CET
From Enlightened Socialist Party
ToDebating the Lower the Gates
MessageLike it or not, this will be used to enforce racism, FP...

Date12:49:18, July 19, 2005 CET
From Slytherius Party
ToDebating the Lower the Gates
MessageGated communities are not ghettos, for heaven's sake!If you are so concerned with discrimination issue, make a fair housing act and state clearly that no housing may be denied to minorities.Or something along these lines.

Date19:56:05, July 19, 2005 CET
From freedom party
ToDebating the Lower the Gates
MessageWe simply have no right to socially engineer. It is not the place of good government.
Irrational thoughts like racism cannot be forced out. All attempting to do that will do is cause a more bitter and devisive hatred.

Date08:57:19, July 20, 2005 CET
From Commercial Freedom
ToDebating the Lower the Gates
MessageIn a perfect society this would be fine but we might have to make some radical moves to stamp out racism completely.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 132

no
  

Total Seats: 138

abstain
 

Total Seats: 30


Random fact: Alduria, Rildanor and Lourenne all have Canrilaise (French) cultures.

Random quote: "Politics is perhaps the only profession for which no preparation is thought necessary." - Robert Louis Stevenson

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 89