Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5475
Next month in: 00:48:15
Server time: 11:11:44, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): dannypk19 | LC73DunMHP | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Rule on military

Details

Submitted by[?]: Falanges Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2342

Description[?]:

This law gives Christians their minimum rights.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:04:17, January 08, 2007 CET
FromChristian People's Party (IA)
ToDebating the Rule on military
MessageThis will seriously weaken our military

Date19:06:19, January 08, 2007 CET
FromFalanges Party
ToDebating the Rule on military
MessageNot necessarily, because the non- Christians will be replaced by Christians. On the contrary, we will have a more homogeneous army.

Date19:29:57, January 08, 2007 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Rule on military
MessageI feel passing this wil open the floodgates to political interference in the running of the armed forces of the Crown. Before we knew it the enemies of His Majesty and God would have brought in "positive discrimination" or political correctness, rather than simply returning to the status quo.

Date19:31:23, January 08, 2007 CET
FromChristian People's Party (IA)
ToDebating the Rule on military
MessageSo you are willing to sacrifice the lives of good hard working Christians, and let cults and sects run wild in Luthori. Cute christians you are.

Date19:37:16, January 08, 2007 CET
FromFalanges Party
ToDebating the Rule on military
MessageWell this is not how we preceived it: Being a member in the army is not "sacrificing lives", but we consider it as a privilege because defending the Empire and God should be a privilege dedicated only to the Christians.
But we feel that this law is not making a concensus, so no problem.

Date19:46:19, January 08, 2007 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Rule on military
MessageNon-Christian soldiers can quite adequately serve a Christian Empire. Take the Gurkhas for instance, not to mention the Seikhs in the Indian Army or soldiers (Buddhists?) recruited from Hong Kong.

Date20:18:13, January 08, 2007 CET
FromCatholic Justicial Party - Solidarity
ToDebating the Rule on military
MessageThe Unionist Party has a good point. We will likely oppose this (apologies to our friends in the CDP).

Date21:09:35, January 08, 2007 CET
FromFalanges Party
ToDebating the Rule on military
MessageWell, as I said, i may have been misunderstood. Building a army of Christians is an HONOR for the Christians. I thaught that it was necessary to "purify" the army from non christians. I really did not understand why this proposal have been rejected especially by our allies whose greatest goal is to achieve an Empire where Christians are the true rulers.

Date18:52:37, January 09, 2007 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Rule on military
MessageWe agree wholeheartedly with the CDP's aims. As I've said, foreign mercenaries can fight quite adequately for a Christian army, but if you're planning to create a theocracy through a military coup you would need far more loyalty than these types would offer.

Date18:53:28, January 09, 2007 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Rule on military
MessageRahter than vote against our Christian brothers we will abstain.

Date20:47:22, January 09, 2007 CET
FromFalanges Party
ToDebating the Rule on military
MessageWe thanks our brothers in the Unionist Party.
Long live the Christians
Long live the Emperor
Long live the Holy Empire.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 26

no
     

Total Seats: 63

abstain
 

Total Seats: 11


Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363

Random quote: "One of the greatest delusions in the world is the hope that the evils in this world are to be cured by legislation." - Thomas B. Reed

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 67