Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5477
Next month in: 03:21:23
Server time: 20:38:36, May 01, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): albaniansunited | Sevenberry | Tayes_Gad | ZulanALD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Federal Education Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: People's Freedom Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2342

Description[?]:

We would like to propose a few changes for our education-system:

Sexual Education in schools:
we need to protect our younger citizens from unwanted pregnancy, if we ignore this we might very well face demographics of a thirld-world country at some point.

The teacher's right to discipline children:
Allowing local governments to use whatever punishment they see fit is not democratical. Punishment is proportionate to the crime in most democracies for hundreds of years already, hight time for us to catch up.

Policy concerning racial segregation in educational institutions.
We can't allow local governments to establish laws which are basically against the human rights. It sickens the PFP to see racism tolerated and almost encouraged in such a way.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:13:51, January 08, 2007 CET
From Front de Libèration du Kanjor
ToDebating the Federal Education Act
MessageWe support Article 1 and 2, and we have stated in the past that no school should ever have the right to seperate just because of a race but it seemed that a certain federalist party in Kanjor never saw that point...shame.

We feel that schools should set there own discipline system, "Discipline levels are set by schools."

Date22:30:33, January 08, 2007 CET
From National Coalition Party
ToDebating the Federal Education Act
MessageWe support the bill as a whole for the reasons mentioned by PFP. Discipline measures must not be left for the schools themselves as the risk for abuse is bigger than when there are clear discipline norms set by bureau of education.

Date00:34:52, January 09, 2007 CET
From Les Verts du Kanjor
ToDebating the Federal Education Act
MessageWe support all articles of the bill.

We believe that punishment (especially physical punishment) should be the prerogative of the parents, not teachers. We think it is absurd to teach a child that the only way to be respected is to beat others into submission, and the use of physical violence in school is detrimental to a child's learning.

Date01:31:49, January 09, 2007 CET
From Front de Libèration du Kanjor
ToDebating the Federal Education Act
MessageWe would prefer either Article 3 be changed to "Discipline levels are set by schools." or be moved to a seperate bill.

If its moved to a seperate bill we will support 1 and 2.

Date02:22:28, January 09, 2007 CET
From People's Freedom Party
ToDebating the Federal Education Act
MessageWe removed article three and will perhaps bring it up in a seperate bill, as there were no other problems with the suggestion reported we can start voting.

Date04:05:25, January 09, 2007 CET
From Partie Patriotique de Kanjor
ToDebating the Federal Education Act
MessageWe oppose these proposals. How can it be more democratiic to take away the right of Provinces and schools to decide upon these matters? Sexual education should not be compulsory in the education system, this takes away the rights of parents to decide how this education should occur.

Date04:57:24, January 09, 2007 CET
From Front de Libèration du Kanjor
ToDebating the Federal Education Act
MessageEven as a religious party and a strict one at that, Sexual Education is a must for any person entering puberty, we cant always rely on Parents to do the job.

If Parents want to home school their children then they can, Sexual Education is important for someone especially entering puberty were AIDS, HIVS, and other diseases can occur without proper direction.

The KCTP simply doesnt understand your vision of "Democracy"

Date05:01:24, January 09, 2007 CET
From Front de Libèration du Kanjor
ToDebating the Federal Education Act
MessageAlso look to other countries, more then half of those countries have these Laws.

Date05:15:23, January 09, 2007 CET
From Partie Patriotique de Kanjor
ToDebating the Federal Education Act
MessageWhat other countries do is their concern not ours. If parents believe that school based sexual education is warranted, under the current system they can send their children to schools which offers it. Those parents who believe schools should have no part in it, can send them to schools which do not have it.

We realise that the KCTP doesn't understand democracy, that is evident from their desire to establish a dictatorial theocratic state and by the means which they use, murder and arson!

Date12:13:41, January 09, 2007 CET
From People's Freedom Party
ToDebating the Federal Education Act
MessageIf the PPK is scared of a theocratic state it doesn't make sense that it opposes this bill, which limits the effect of religious fanatics and obsolete tradition on our laws.

Direct democracy is a good thing, but giving authority to local governments in every case without consideration is not for the best of our citizens, as this case shows. Besides, the federal government needs to set a number of guidelines for behaviour to maintain the integrity of our nation.

Date12:20:35, January 09, 2007 CET
From People's Freedom Party
ToDebating the Federal Education Act
MessageWe would also like to point out that a party voting against this act makes itself responsible for all the unwanted teenage-pregnancies and their social and economical effects that plague our country today.

Date13:19:17, January 09, 2007 CET
From Partie Patriotique de Kanjor
ToDebating the Federal Education Act
MessageWe wish to thank the PFP for the implied compliment about our virility. However we do believe it is up to parents to make those decisions.

Date13:58:00, January 09, 2007 CET
From Front de Libèration du Kanjor
ToDebating the Federal Education Act
Message"What other countries do is their concern not ours."

That is a farce, as you have involved Kanjor in numerous amounts of treaties and other international organizations.

Date14:09:04, January 09, 2007 CET
From Partie Patriotique de Kanjor
ToDebating the Federal Education Act
MessageThat is a different issue, we do not interfere in the internal affairs of other countries, what they do within their borders is their business. Using the 'others countries do it so should we] argument is like letting them interfere in our internal affairs.


subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 49

no
  

Total Seats: 176

abstain
   

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Large scale RP planning (such as wars, regional/continental conflicts, economic collapse, etc.) should be planned (as best as it can be) and should have consent of a majority of players involved.

Random quote: "The most radical revolutionary will become a conservative the day after the revolution." - Hannah Arendt

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 80