We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Religious Agenda Revised
Details
Submitted by[?]: Permissive Social Union
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2342
Description[?]:
| We feel the reforms in this area are sorely needed. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change
Taxation of religious institutions.
Old value:: All religious income, despite the use, is taxed.
Current: Religions are treated as companies, and all profit is taxed, however, charitable donations are not taxed.
Proposed: No religions are taxed.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The state's policy concerning religious clothing.
Old value:: Public officials are not allowed to wear religious symbols while exercising their duties.
Current: Wearing religious clothing or religious symbols in public is illegal.
Proposed: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning religions.
Old value:: There is no government policy concerning a state religion.
Current: There is no official state religion, but the government only allows recognized religions. 'Cults' are persecuted.
Proposed: There is an official state religion, but membership is completely voluntary.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:48:19, January 09, 2007 CET | From | AM Populist Social Democrats | To | Debating the Religious Agenda Revised |
| Message | So religions can make all the money they want tax free, and there's even an official state set of superstitions? This is a horrid, horrid proposal. |
| Date | 14:41:27, January 09, 2007 CET | From | AM Radical Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Religious Agenda Revised |
| Message | Due to article 3, we cannot support this proposal |
| Date | 20:30:03, January 09, 2007 CET | From |  Likaton Coalition of the Willing | To | Debating the Religious Agenda Revised |
| Message | Unfortunately, the LITP cannot support article 3, although we would support Articles 1 & 2 if we they were raised seperately. As a footnote, the word horrid should not be used. The correct adjective would be horrible. Regards, The LITP |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 25 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 174 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy. |
| Random quote: "A wise ruler ought never to keep faith when by doing so it would be against his interests." - Niccolo Machiavelli |