Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5474
Next month in: 01:35:32
Server time: 14:24:27, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): albaniansunited | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Moral Laws

Details

Submitted by[?]: Falanges Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2343

Description[?]:

It is time for our Holy Empire to have moral laws.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:47:39, January 10, 2007 CET
FromCatholic Justicial Party - Solidarity
ToDebating the Moral Laws
MessageThe first one is fine by me. But the seond one... how can we ensure that sex is only for procreation?!

Date20:59:09, January 10, 2007 CET
FromSpiritualists' National Union
ToDebating the Moral Laws
MessageWe remain opposed to both of these Articles.

Date21:22:56, January 10, 2007 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Moral Laws
MessageWe'd like to see a softer approach for article II. What's wrong with a man and his wife enjoying sexual relations, within wedlock, to express their love for one another?

Date21:32:27, January 10, 2007 CET
FromCatholic Justicial Party - Solidarity
ToDebating the Moral Laws
MessageGood point. Can this be modified?

Date21:46:09, January 10, 2007 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Moral Laws
MessageYes, simply remove the article then add it again with the appropriate amendment.

Date23:36:54, January 10, 2007 CET
FromFalanges Party
ToDebating the Moral Laws
MessageYou convinced me Unionist and CJP.
I will remove (for now) article 2.

Date23:42:57, January 10, 2007 CET
FromFalanges Party
ToDebating the Moral Laws
MessageBut I think this can be resolved by this current article 2

Date11:36:07, January 11, 2007 CET
FromSpiritualists' National Union
ToDebating the Moral Laws
MessageWe are very disappointed that this is being passed. It will inflict great misery upon millions of women and gay people.

Date17:23:48, January 11, 2007 CET
FromCatholic Justicial Party - Solidarity
ToDebating the Moral Laws
MessageIt will save many innocent lives.

Date02:07:45, January 12, 2007 CET
FromSpiritualists' National Union
ToDebating the Moral Laws
MessageThe passing of this Bill will be absolutely shameful.

Date14:18:12, January 12, 2007 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Moral Laws
MessageFor the record the Unionist would have voted for this bill, had our members not been busy crusading. We celebrate its assent.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 51

no
  

Total Seats: 38

abstain
 

Total Seats: 11


Random fact: Did you know you can change the official name of your nation? All you need to do is draw up a new name that is in accordance with the Nation Renaming Guide, pass a bill proposing the name change with a two-thirds majority and then post a request to Moderation on the "Renaming Requests" thread. You can change city and region names in this way too.

Random quote: "The empires of the future are the empires of the mind." - Winston Churchill

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 72