Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5475
Next month in: 01:48:36
Server time: 10:11:23, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): AethanKal | JWDL | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Technology, Pornography, and Child Abuse Bill (2347)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Socio-Captialist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2349

Description[?]:

Copyrights need to be protected, pornography should be available to adults, and teachers are forbidden to hit a child in class...

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:21:28, January 20, 2007 CET
From Socio-Captialist Party
ToDebating the Technology, Pornography, and Child Abuse Bill (2347)
MessageHere are many Articles that are self-explainitory and need change

Date22:32:32, January 20, 2007 CET
From Kanjoran Socialist Party
ToDebating the Technology, Pornography, and Child Abuse Bill (2347)
MessageSaying that they are self-explanatory is assuming that everybody is operating on the same wavelength as you. If you look at family and society, you can see that if you refrain absolutly from making physical contact with a child, then he/she will most likly become out of control by the teenage years and at school.

Pornography is a moral issue so cannot be argued against logically, people will get it one way or another

I agree with artical one, as an artist I would not like people stealing work it took me days or weeks to do. Same with technology.

Date22:46:38, January 20, 2007 CET
From Socio-Captialist Party
ToDebating the Technology, Pornography, and Child Abuse Bill (2347)
MessageThe current law "Teachers may use corporal punishment at their discretion" is a bit foggy to me. Could you possibly explain the benefits of child abuse (i.e. hitting a child)? No discepline is disasterous, however too much discepline is also disasterous.

Also, the "self-explanitory" text was a typo. I'll be sure to fire my journalist...


Date03:27:51, January 21, 2007 CET
From Partie Patriotique de Kanjor
ToDebating the Technology, Pornography, and Child Abuse Bill (2347)
MessageWe feel that article 1 already gives sufficent protection to copyright holders. We thoroughly agree with article 2 and with article 3 we feel that matters of discipline should be the responsibility of the schools, that way parents can decide the appropriate type of discipline they want for their children.

Date07:11:43, January 21, 2007 CET
From Socio-Captialist Party
ToDebating the Technology, Pornography, and Child Abuse Bill (2347)
MessageI don't understand how limited protection of copyrights is enough. Like IP said, I wouldn't want my music and/or art being ripped off due to limited laws on protection...

Date08:48:31, January 21, 2007 CET
From Partie Patriotique de Kanjor
ToDebating the Technology, Pornography, and Child Abuse Bill (2347)
MessageThe arts and sciences build upon the works of the past, without free access to these innovation is in fact stifled. Limited copyright protection (say for 25 yrs) enables the creator to make money from their work, but at the same time ensures that the work will eventually be accessible to all.

Date19:41:55, January 23, 2007 CET
From Socio-Captialist Party
ToDebating the Technology, Pornography, and Child Abuse Bill (2347)
MessageI understand. Taking the article down.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 154

no
 

Total Seats: 52

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Head to the "Language assistance" thread to receive and offer help with translations: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6368

    Random quote: "Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue." - Barry Goldwater

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 63