We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Technology, Pornography, and Child Abuse Bill (2347)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Socio-Captialist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2349
Description[?]:
Copyrights need to be protected, pornography should be available to adults, and teachers are forbidden to hit a child in class... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The distribution, purchasing and possession of material depicting pornographic acts.
Old value:: All forms of pornography are illegal.
Current: Pornography depicting consenting adults is legal for adults.
Proposed: Pornography depicting consenting adults is legal for adults.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The teacher's right to discipline children.
Old value:: Teachers may use corporal punishment at their discretion.
Current: Teachers are forbidden from striking children and may only use non-contact discipline (detention, expulsion etc).
Proposed: Teachers are forbidden from striking children and may only use non-contact discipline (detention, expulsion etc).
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:21:28, January 20, 2007 CET | From | Socio-Captialist Party | To | Debating the Technology, Pornography, and Child Abuse Bill (2347) |
Message | Here are many Articles that are self-explainitory and need change |
Date | 22:32:32, January 20, 2007 CET | From | Kanjoran Socialist Party | To | Debating the Technology, Pornography, and Child Abuse Bill (2347) |
Message | Saying that they are self-explanatory is assuming that everybody is operating on the same wavelength as you. If you look at family and society, you can see that if you refrain absolutly from making physical contact with a child, then he/she will most likly become out of control by the teenage years and at school. Pornography is a moral issue so cannot be argued against logically, people will get it one way or another I agree with artical one, as an artist I would not like people stealing work it took me days or weeks to do. Same with technology. |
Date | 22:46:38, January 20, 2007 CET | From | Socio-Captialist Party | To | Debating the Technology, Pornography, and Child Abuse Bill (2347) |
Message | The current law "Teachers may use corporal punishment at their discretion" is a bit foggy to me. Could you possibly explain the benefits of child abuse (i.e. hitting a child)? No discepline is disasterous, however too much discepline is also disasterous. Also, the "self-explanitory" text was a typo. I'll be sure to fire my journalist... |
Date | 03:27:51, January 21, 2007 CET | From | Partie Patriotique de Kanjor | To | Debating the Technology, Pornography, and Child Abuse Bill (2347) |
Message | We feel that article 1 already gives sufficent protection to copyright holders. We thoroughly agree with article 2 and with article 3 we feel that matters of discipline should be the responsibility of the schools, that way parents can decide the appropriate type of discipline they want for their children. |
Date | 07:11:43, January 21, 2007 CET | From | Socio-Captialist Party | To | Debating the Technology, Pornography, and Child Abuse Bill (2347) |
Message | I don't understand how limited protection of copyrights is enough. Like IP said, I wouldn't want my music and/or art being ripped off due to limited laws on protection... |
Date | 08:48:31, January 21, 2007 CET | From | Partie Patriotique de Kanjor | To | Debating the Technology, Pornography, and Child Abuse Bill (2347) |
Message | The arts and sciences build upon the works of the past, without free access to these innovation is in fact stifled. Limited copyright protection (say for 25 yrs) enables the creator to make money from their work, but at the same time ensures that the work will eventually be accessible to all. |
Date | 19:41:55, January 23, 2007 CET | From | Socio-Captialist Party | To | Debating the Technology, Pornography, and Child Abuse Bill (2347) |
Message | I understand. Taking the article down. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 154 | |||
no | Total Seats: 52 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Head to the "Language assistance" thread to receive and offer help with translations: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6368 |
Random quote: "Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue." - Barry Goldwater |