We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of January 2349
Details
Submitted by[?]: Noordelijk Bevrijding Front
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2349
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Socialist Party of Dorvik
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Green Freedom Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Socialist Party of Dorvik
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Noordelijk Bevrijding Front
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Socialist Party of Dorvik
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Noordelijk Bevrijding Front
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Green Freedom Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the 
Democratic Party of Dorvik
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Noordelijk Bevrijding Front
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Democratic Party of Dorvik
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Socialist Party of Dorvik
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Green Freedom Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Socialistic Left
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:52:27, January 23, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Party of Dorvik | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2349 |
| Message | We accept this coalition proposal as we see that it's important to keep all political options open and promote the cooperation between all parties. |
| Date | 23:54:29, January 23, 2007 CET | From | Green Freedom Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2349 |
| Message | Now we're just waiting on the SL... |
| Date | 00:16:15, January 24, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Party of Dorvik | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2349 |
| Message | (OOC: Alohasoy or Oliverry could inquire from SL about their reasons for certain inactivity) |
| Date | 01:23:58, January 24, 2007 CET | From | Green Freedom Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2349 |
| Message | (OOC: I will do so.) |
| Date | 18:30:27, January 24, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Party of Dorvik | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2349 |
| Message | If the Socialistic Left doesn't vote for this government coalition in September 2349, the Moderates have to reconsider their cooperation with DCMLU & GC(VU): working democracy & active party cooperation are corner stones of our party's ideology. |
| Date | 23:02:49, January 24, 2007 CET | From | Green Freedom Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2349 |
| Message | NOOOO! The coalition is about to fail, and all because of the SL! |
| Date | 23:06:31, January 24, 2007 CET | From | Socialist Party of Dorvik | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2349 |
| Message | I won't be going to comment, seeing as I had been in a similar position before (I could only log in a week out of 2) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 132 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 138 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 29 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "One day our descendants will think it incredible that we paid so much attention to things like the amount of melanin in our skin or the shape of our eyes or our gender instead of the unique identities of each of us as complex human beings." - Franklin Thomas |