We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Agriculture Readjustment
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party of Valruzia
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2083
Description[?]:
| This bill maintains economic progress and efficiency in agriculture. This bill also encourages scientific progress in crop production. GM crops increase yield and thus benefit society. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government agricultural and farming subsidies policy.
Old value:: The government subsidises the operations of low-income farming families.
Current: Agricultural crops which are considered beneficial to the enviroment or to the continued ecological safety of the state are subsidized.
Proposed: The government allows local governments to craft agricultural subsidy policy.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:30:06, July 17, 2005 CET | From |  Deadly Buzz Party | To | Debating the Agriculture Readjustment |
| Message | No to no. 1 but no. 2 has my support but has alread been suggested in another bill. And then the Commies suggest a communist version of it. |
| Date | 01:35:30, July 17, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Valruzia | To | Debating the Agriculture Readjustment |
| Message | Why no to #1? Better for the economy. |
| Date | 01:41:43, July 17, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Valruzia | To | Debating the Agriculture Readjustment |
| Message | The current subsidies policy toward ag is commie. I think totally eliminating subsidies would not pass. I think limiting subsidies to market forces is more efficient. |
| Date | 05:37:48, July 17, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Party of Valruzia | To | Debating the Agriculture Readjustment |
| Message | No to 1 - we're against subsidies all together. |
| Date | 15:54:20, July 17, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Valruzia | To | Debating the Agriculture Readjustment |
| Message | It will not pass if I go that way. The current system supports failing farms which is harmful to the economy. |
| Date | 16:04:17, July 18, 2005 CET | From | Zuman Independence Party | To | Debating the Agriculture Readjustment |
| Message | You're a loony |
| Date | 19:44:39, July 18, 2005 CET | From | Alliance for Natural Law | To | Debating the Agriculture Readjustment |
| Message | We support local subsidies only, and the latter proposal is indeed in a bill of it's own. |
| Date | 20:50:23, July 18, 2005 CET | From | Zuman Independence Party | To | Debating the Agriculture Readjustment |
| Message | Insects does not distinct from gm and natural plants those genes are doomed to be spread. I had actually expected even right wing loonies to think things trough, before jumping in to them. So it seems the big seed companies have bougth you all out as they care as much for the planet as americans for human rights. |
| Date | 12:32:19, July 20, 2005 CET | From | Zuman Independence Party | To | Debating the Agriculture Readjustment |
| Message | The right wing have only one plan for the countryside; complete depopulation. lol |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 52 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 99 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 24 |
| Random fact: "Kubrk" is a Jelbic word that has the colloquial meaning "old man" or "geezer". |
| Random quote: "The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves." - Henry Kissinger |